Welcome to Eureka Street

back to site

What the bishops chose not to say

 

Those Catholics and other ‘people of good will’ who notice the Bishops’ federal election statement for May 2025 will be puzzled and exasperated: puzzled by its modest aspirations and exasperated by its narrow contents and lack of energy and engagement.

Issued under the title “Called to Bring Hope in the Year of Jubilee” the statement references the coincidence of the election with the Holy Year of Jubilee, themed ‘Pilgrims of Hope’. It was produced under the banner of the Bishops Commission for Life, Family and Public Engagement, chaired by the Archbishop of Melbourne.

It has some strengths. For instance, the theme of ‘hope’, though underdeveloped in this document, is promising at a time of local and international uncertainty. The statement points out growing polarisation, distrust and the erosion of social cohesion in society and encourages participation. Wisely it plays down unrealistic expectations that politicians and political parties ‘can ever solve every issue’.

But its strengths are greatly outweighed by its weaknesses. It is neither timely, nor a balanced representation of the breadth of Catholic values and interests (even a relatively short statement can do this) nor engaging in its style. It conveys no sense of Australia’s place in the world in an election overshadowed by the threatening presence and policies of US President Donald Trump. There is no mention of the great international issues of the day, such as Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Gaza. Domestically there is no mention of immigration and refugees nor of Indigenous Australians.

It is fair to say that most of it fails to engage specifically with this particular Australian election. Most of it could have been written by any episcopal conference for any election anytime anywhere. As such it is excessively general. The only specific reference is when it condemns ‘the anti-Semitism that has arisen in our society’. It could easily have been issued for any Australian state election. The consequence is a missed opportunity for national public engagement.

The statement identifies four key issues. In doing so it betrays its origins in the narrow remit of the commission for life and family. The topics identified are: (1) the dignity and value of every human being; (2) fairness, justice and the common good; (3) religious freedom and conscience rights; and (briefly) (4) responsible stewardship of God’s creation.

Leading with life and family issues is unexceptional, but its focus on abortion, euthanasia, marriage and family fails to connect with federal politics. The second section on fairness, justice and the common good deserves a place in any statement, but of all the possible examples it chooses gaps in services, such as palliative care, and respect for ‘the conscience of providers’. What of the housing crisis? The third section on religious freedom moves quickly to parental freedom of choice to send their children to faith-based schools with ‘equitable funding’. This has been a long-standing church interest, consuming the attention of the bishops in recent times. The final section on responsible stewardship of god’s creation is disproportionately short, lifeless and has no sense of the urgency conveyed by Pope Francis and taken up energetically by many lay Catholics.

More could be said about improving its style, drawing on the lessons of those who successfully inform their members and guide public discussion through clear and bold language. Many other Church bodies and groups have already issued their own statements. They will provide more enlightenment for the Catholic community. The Bishops collectively really must do better if the church is to impact positively on Australian society during this federal election campaign.

 


John Warhurst is an Emeritus Professor of Political Science at the Australian National University.

 

 

submit a comment

Existing comments

If, as alleged, "life and family issues" [fail]to connect with federal politics", it's more than opportune that those in the federal sphere and we who elect them examine our political and social priorities, especially the role of the state and its relation to the common good.


John RD | 11 April 2025  

John, you are too kind to them by far.
(1) the dignity and value of every human being; If they believed this they would practice what the preach about Article2 Universal Declaration Human Rights and grant women equal access to the sacraments.
(2) fairness, justice and the common good; This is not practiced by the church- there is not one Aboriginal or TS Islander priest or nun in the country.
(3) religious freedom and conscience rights; This is a smokescreen for let us keep our tax free subsidized highly differential education system;
and (briefly)
(4) responsible stewardship of God’s creation.
An estimated 250 Catholic priests in the U.S. are Black out of 37,000 diocesan and religious priests, or 0.67% of the total.
That's right! Less than 1%.
And in Australia ?
There are 3,017 clergy in Australia, of whom 1,810 are diocesan priests (including all priests and bishops, both active and retired, and priests from overseas working in the dioceses), 1,003 priests who belong to religious orders and 204 permanent deacons.
Figures from the Australian Catholic Migrant and Refugee Office (ACMRO) data indicate that 727 overseas-born clergy arrived in Australia between March 2012 and September 2022.
Zero Aboriginal priests.
But a disproportionate number of indigenous victims abused by clergy, priests, nuns, brothers.


Francis Armstrong | 11 April 2025  

Thanks, John. Bland and insipid characterize the statement. Bishops frequently mention the social justice principles, human dignity and common good. They seldom mention other principles which challenge the current order. Solidarity with the poor and vulnerable, nationally and internationally rarely rates a mention. Subsidiarity (which relates to their call in relation to catholic education) similarly. The principle, Preferential Option for the Poor and Vulnerable is hardly ever mentioned.
Bishop Zaidan’s 8 April letter for the USCCB to President Trump mentions "Now, more than ever, addressing the difficult economic conditions in the developing world—which affect our country’s security and trade relationships—requires bold leadership. Debt, investment, and financial conditions in developing countries have deteriorated, plunging millions deeper into poverty, hunger, and destitution—paving the way for radicalization and instability. On average, strategically important developing nations currently spend more than 40% of their revenue on debt payments. Nearly 800 million people worldwide face hunger and almost 700 million live in extreme poverty. The reduction of foreign assistance from developed to developing countries over the past six years underscores the urgency of our country’s efforts to implement meaningful debt relief policies". Jubilee hope “requires bold leadership” not moderate urging.


Kimball Chen | 11 April 2025  

Already voters have reached saturation point in media coverage of the looming election. When the PM falls off a stage, it is big news. When the Opposition Leader injures a photographer with a footy kick, it is big news. The Bishops could choose one of their number to engage with the media via television and radio e.g. short, direct statements on matters vital to voters. Like the housing crisis, homelessness and hopelessness. It will show the Church is very much interested in society's travails. And that the Church wants to connect.


Pam | 13 April 2025  
Join the conversation. Sign up for our free weekly newsletter  Subscribe