Welcome to Eureka Street

back to site

Can religious freedom and education coexist?

11 Comments

 

The discourse surrounding religious freedom in Australia has become increasingly contentious, especially in the context of schooling. As a former Australian Senator and now as the executive director of the National Catholic Education Commission, I have noted with concern the growing perception that holding religious beliefs and values and making choices based on them is somehow discriminatory or at odds with modern society. This misconception must be addressed, particularly as it undermines the very principles of diversity and inclusion that Australia has committed to uphold.

Religious freedom is a fundamental human right. It is enshrined in international law which Australia has ratified, and is also recognised, albeit in a limited way, in our Constitution. Australia’s commitment extends, not only to the freedom to worship, but also to the right to live and teach according to one's religious beliefs and values. For parents, this includes the right to choose an education for their children that aligns with their faith and moral beliefs. Choosing a faith-based school is not an act of exclusion or discrimination; rather, it is a deeply personal decision for parents driven by their desire to raise children in an environment that nurtures not only their academic and cultural development, but also their spiritual formation, understanding of religious teachings, and eternal relationship with God.

In a pluralist society like Australia, diversity is celebrated in many facets of society. We claim to value different perspectives, cultures and lifestyles. Yet, when it comes to religious views and expressions, there is an increasing tendency to marginalise them or regard them as outdated or discriminatory. This is particularly evident in the debate over religious schools and their place in the broader educational landscape with our schools being denied critical resources such as Commonwealth Teaching Scholarships.

Yet, religious schools are one of the fastest growing segments of schooling and play a vital role in Australia’s education system, serving families from a variety of religious backgrounds. Catholic schools have educated millions of young people for over 200 years and have a long-standing tradition of providing quality education that is accessible to all who choose it, regardless of their socio-economic background. The Catholic sector has grown alongside the government sector and is the largest provider of schooling outside of government, and the largest provider of faith-based schooling, currently enrolling 20 per cent or some 805,000 students and employing 109,000 staff across 1,756 schools.

Our schools are guided by a distinct ethos, one that emphasises Catholic social teaching and gospel values such as forgiveness, compassion, respect, and social justice - values that are not only integral to the Catholic faith, but also resonate with the broader community. Our graduates go on to make a meaningful contribution to society through their families, and in ministry, business and not-for-profit organisations, politics and leadership, philanthropy, volunteering and community outreach. The notion that it is somehow discriminatory for religious schools to operate and teach according to their beliefs, or to employ staff who support those beliefs, is a misunderstanding of both the nature of faith-based schools and the rights of the families who choose them.

Parents who enrol their children in religious schools do so because they believe in the value of an education that integrates culture and learning with faith. This choice is an expression of their religious freedom, not an attempt to impose their beliefs onto others. To argue otherwise is to overlook the diversity of educational options available in Australia and the importance of respecting parental choice and rights. One of my often-used examples is the growing community-run Nature School in Port Macquarie where parents who desire an education for their children based on ecology and nature enrol their children. Like other ideological schools such as Montessori and Steiner, The Nature School is funded in part by the government, but we don’t see debate about the selection of staff for these schools.

It is quite hypocritical that many of the organisations calling for limitations on faith-based schools are at the same time being ‘discriminating’ about their own membership. For example, would the Australian Greens Party, be willing to accept members from the coal mining sector?

Religious freedom and other protections, such as those against sexual discrimination, are not mutually exclusive. They can and must coexist in a balanced manner. The challenge lies in finding a path forward that upholds the rights of all individuals while fostering a society that is genuinely inclusive. One way to achieve this balance is through clear and consistent legal protections for religious freedom, alongside robust anti-discrimination laws. Such protections should ensure that religious institutions, including schools, can operate according to their beliefs without fear of reprisal or being forced to compromise their values. At the same time, these laws must also safeguard the rights of individuals who may not share the same beliefs, ensuring that they are treated with dignity and respect. Catholic schools manage this balance on the whole very well.

 

'It is not about privileging one set of beliefs over another, but about creating an environment where diverse perspectives can coexist peacefully. This is the essence of true inclusion one that does not merely tolerate differences, but embraces them as a strength.'

 

In the absence of proactive legislation to uphold religious freedom, the clumsier but often-used approach of exemptions in legislation protect institutions from unfair discrimination lawfare. This is the current status for faith-based schools in Australia. While it is not wholly desirable and does not address the increasing prevalence of state legislation impinging on faith-based schools, it does offer some safeguards for our schools to continue to build a community of faith.

While it seems, that for now, the Albanese Government’s commitments to introduce religious discrimination legislation have stalled, any path forward must include a broad community and political consensus that protects religious freedom and respects the rights of Australians to hold religious and other beliefs, and ensures families can raise and educate their children according to these beliefs. In a pluralist society, policy making must be based on respect and fair treatment which requires dialogue, understanding, and a willingness to accommodate differing views. It is not about privileging one set of beliefs over another, but about creating an environment where diverse perspectives can coexist peacefully. This is the essence of true inclusion one that does not merely tolerate differences, but embraces them as a strength.

 

 


Jacinta Collins is the Executive Director of the National Catholic Education Commission and a former Australian Senator for Victoria.

 

Topic tags: Jacinta Collins, Religious Freedom, Education, Schools, Catholic, Human Rights

 

 

submit a comment

Existing comments

"Policy making . . . is not about privileging one set of beliefs over another, but about creating an environment where diverse perspectives can co-exist peacefully."
Are not all religious schools, of their nature, committed to "privileging" their beliefs and the teachings and practices that go with them? Are the defining demands of religious faith to be subordinated to secular ideas of "inclusion" and a secularized irenicism?


John RD | 22 August 2024  

Freedom of speech, freedom of association and democracy itself are losing ground in Australia.

In a free society, any organisation has the right to employ those who support its purposes and refuse employment to those who do not. The Greens do not have to employ members of the Labor Party, the Labor Party does not have to employ members of the Liberal Party, and the Liberal Party does not have to employ Greens. The AIDS Council does not have to employ people who say homosexuality is a sin, and a rugby club does not have to employ someone who says Aussie Rules is the way to go, but a rugby club has no right to refuse employment to the former and the AUDS Council has no right to refuse employment to the latter.

A religious school has the right to employ adherents of its religion and refuse employment to those who are not. It is astounding that this is even controversial, but we must not forget why the previous religious freedom bill failed: the Liberals, thinking religious people were gullible, cynically decided they could use the issue issue in a second election.


Chris Curtis | 22 August 2024  

Just a few points: "gospel values such as forgiveness, compassion, respect, and social justice" I understand that the arguments in this piece are not about forgiveness and the like. which are universal values. "For example, would the Australian Greens Party, be willing to accept members from the coal mining sector?" not altogether relevant but as someone who is fairly familiar with the Greens, the answer is surely 'yes'. "It is not about privileging one set of beliefs over another", Surely it is for religious schools or why have them? My main issue with this article is that Jacinta manages to move around the elephant in the room. The official teaching of the Catholic church (and by inference the Catholic school) still does not accept certain sexual practices and the right to abortion to mention two issues. To accept public monies while not accepting rights and laws of this public it seems to me is simply wrong regardless and certainly not "the essence of true inclusion."


Tom Michael Kingston | 22 August 2024  
Show Responses

Catholics are part of the public and it is a natural right to have children raised in their own faith (i.e. the government must provide the money if it wishes to have compulsory education_


Daniel Hickey | 08 September 2024  

I don't accept the assertion that freedom of religion means the right to choose an education for their children that aligns with their faith and moral beliefs. Faith and moral beliefs should be taught in the home. If the parents are not able to do this, perhaps they should be examining their own practices. Nor do I accept the assertion that, "Parents who enrol their children in religious schools do so because they believe in the value of an education that integrates culture and learning with faith." This might be true for some parents, but there is ample evidence that for many the motivator is the social and educational advantages of being in fabulously wealthy schools. The elephant in the room here is funding. Again the evidence is that the inequality in Australian education is growing more extreme. All children should have the opportunity to go to well-funded, well-equipped schools, which reflect the diversity of our society, not to be schooled in silos based on the parents' religion, wealth or social class.


Anne McMenamin | 22 August 2024  

This article asks: "For example, would the Australian Greens Party, be willing to accept members from the coal mining sector?"
Laudate Deum quotes bishops "climate change makes manifest a tragic and striking example of structural sin".
Coal is the largest contributor to climate change.
So perhaps a more relevant question is whether a Catholic school has a duty to make it very clear at the initial admission interview that the school, under its religious ethos, believes the parents are engaging in structural sin, if they work in the coal mining sector.


Joseph Fernandez | 24 August 2024  
Show Responses

While 'structural sin' may be a handy term, its weakness lies in not locating explicitly the source of 'structural' malady in human action and decision-making for which we personally and as a species are responsible.


John RD | 03 September 2024  

Yes, 'religious schools, of their nature, [are]committed to "privileging" their beliefs and the teachings and practices that go with them', and that's the problem. To that extent, they're doing indoctrination rather than education; not only privileging their own set of beliefs, teachings and practices, but also invalidating others. We're fortunate, in this country, that we don't often see the extreme consequences of religious 'silo-ing' of young people through their schooling, but one doesn't have to look far afield, or too far back in our own history, Pulling down the silos was what the 19th century push for free, secular and compulsory education was about.


Ginger Meggs | 03 September 2024  
Show Responses

So, secular education doesn't involve "privileging" of the secular as a world view, and all ideas are of equal value?


John RD | 06 September 2024  

Compulsory education was all about indoctrination, just not in Catholic doctrine, but the liberal doctrine of the state


Danny Dingo | 09 September 2024  

You're confusing 'compulsory' with 'secular', Danny. 'Compulsory' in the late 19th century was about making sure that all kids attended school and developed skills in the 3Rs and none of the church's objected to that. 'Secular' was certainly about instilling 'civic virtues', including queen and country and all that empire stuff, and some pretty conservative values, but it wasn't anti-religion per se because it allowed for 'religious instruction'. 'Secular' was also about improving the efficiency, and therefore effectiveness, of education, especially by replacing several small denominational schools with one larger state school in rural areas. For sure, there were bigoted Protestants just as there were bigoted Catholics around, and even a few bigoted Atheists, but that doesn't mean that the 'free secular and compulsory ' project was anti-Catholic or even anti-religion.


Warwick Dilley | 11 September 2024  

Similar Articles

Poorer students priced out of $50,000 arts degrees

  • Erica Cervini
  • 14 August 2024

University fee hikes have disproportionately affected humanities students, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Despite promises of affordability, many arts degrees now cost more than $50,000, a significant barrier to access for many talented students.

READ MORE
Join the conversation. Sign up for our free weekly newsletter  Subscribe