When millions of Australians look back on this Federal Election campaign, they will recall it as one dominated by ‘gotcha’ moments and scare campaigns. Personal attacks, loud and in-your-face advertising campaigns and so-called missteps by politicians have provided countless hours of talkback content. Regrettably, this has taken the focus of too many away from nuanced conversations about the kind of society in which we want to live, and the policies and vision needed to take us there.
This election arrives at a critical point in our history. While the majority of COVID-19 restrictions have been removed across the country, fresh in our collective memory is the way the pandemic brought many preexisting social and economic issues in Australia to the fore.
In the grips of lockdowns and unforgettable changes to our way of life, there was a new-found focus on the inadequacy of the Jobseeker payment through to long-standing societal issues such as housing and homelessness, mental health, family violence and insecure employment.
As an organisation that has worked with some of the most disadvantaged people and communities for 45 years, Jesuit Social Services witnessed the disproportionate impact of this crisis on already marginalised people and communities. Some of our program participants told us that the temporary Coronavirus Supplement, which ended in March 2021, was the difference between them having to choose between paying to have a roof over the head or essential medication. For others, it meant they could finally afford warm winter clothes.
'Familiar themes often dominate the political spectrum at election times — like tax cuts, the economy and national security. These issues are important but should not overshadow the needs of those on the margins of society.'
What was apparent was that our political leaders’ responses to the pandemic showed that while issues relating to inequality and disadvantage are complex, they are not beyond resolution. In addition to the temporary Coronavirus Supplement, we saw the collaboration of private and public sectors to implement evidence-informed measures that increased the level of mental health support, boosted income, and provided housing for vulnerable people.
These responses were an acknowledgement that Australia’s existing social infrastructure — meant to stop people from slipping through the cracks — was inadequate. However, while the measures demonstrated that a more just and humane society is possible, many were temporary and only provided short-term relief. That’s why it’s important we do not forget the learnings of the past two years, and ensure they can inform a more