Welcome to Eureka Street

back to site

ARTS AND CULTURE

Hacking the parties

  • 02 July 2006

You’ll never start an argument in the pub by saying that politicians are space-wasting, self-serving, unprincipled scallywags. They generally rate lower on professional respect surveys than insurance salespeople and door-to-door evangelists.

By and large our cynicism goes unchallenged, but occasionally we get a shock. Ted Mack, Phil Cleary, Bob Brown, Brian Harradine or Peter Andren come along.

Peter Andren is the former television journalist turned member of the House of Representatives for Calare in the federal parliament. Calare is a 25,000 square kilometre New South Wales electorate taking in Bathurst, Orange, Lithgow and Cowra. It has traditionally been held by the party in government, so after several ALP years Calare was ready to fall to the coalition in 1996.

But Peter Andren came along to spoil the party. Not content to do what every other sensible citizen does—sit back and moan about the cupidity of our elected representatives—he reckoned the time had come to break the stranglehold of the parties on the system. He stood as an independent and, with less than 30 per cent of the primary vote, he won.

Peter Andren is an unusual politician. His electorate is not populated with inner city, left-leaning greenies. So what is he doing supporting gun control, opposing mandatory sentencing, supporting Aboriginal land rights and damning the government’s border protection legislation? And then, would you believe, going on to increase his vote so that by the time of the Tampa election he carried the seat with an absolute majority of first preference votes and now has, at 70 per cent two-party preferred, one of the safest seats in the parliament.

Andren’s success is an indictment of the moral turpitude of the Labor party that believed it could not win the 2001 election if it appeared soft on asylum seekers. The Coalition has no moral credits to lose on this issue and so it threw its dirtiest tricks against Andren, putting out flyers during the campaign claiming that, ‘A vote for Andren is a vote for illegals’. And his National Party opponent said: ‘We’ve got a situation where Australia is going to war but Peter Andren wants to let them in to shoot us.’

Who is this strange man who won’t accept campaign donations larger than $200; who doesn’t do preference deals; who rails against the perks and privileges that politicians routinely vote themselves, including an obscene superannuation scheme; who says he represents no-one but his constituents, but is