Welcome to Eureka Street

back to site

Degrees of discontent

4 Comments

 

The TikTok posts of the mass walkout of graduates, their parents and friends from an Australian Catholic University graduation ceremony in Melbourne was astonishing. Posts showed the event unravelling with the emptying of lime green seats row by row. Academics in their robes and floppy hats left the stage while Joe de Bruyn, the former boss of the Shop Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association (SDA), was still giving his speech at the Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre.

De Bruyn had sparked outrage among the law, arts and education graduates about his stance on social and health issues. De Bruyn denounced IVF for single women and gay marriage, and compared abortion to the loss of life in World War II. ‘Today, over 80,000 unborn children are killed by abortion in Australia each year,’ de Bruyn told the audience. ‘Worldwide, the estimated number is 42 million each year. Abortion is the single biggest killer of human beings in the world, greater than the human toll of World War II. It is a tragedy that must be ended.’

On gay marriage he said, ‘Marriage between a man and woman was instituted by God at the origin of humanity in the Garden of Eden, as the book of Genesis in the Bible tells us.’

De Bruyn, who was SDA’s national secretary from 1978 to 2014, had often used similar words when airing SDA’s opposition to Labor legalising same-sex marriage. After he left as the union’s secretary, the union formally dropped its opposition to gay marriage in 2016. 

The university, a publicly funded institution, had invited de Bruyn to give the graduation speech because it was awarding him an honorary doctorate for services to the Catholic Church, a move that was not without its detractors. St Patrick’s (ACU’s Melbourne campus) Student Association, ACU National Student Association, the Melbourne LGBTIQ+ Society, the ACU Branch of the NTEU and the ACU LGBTIQ+ Staff Ally Network released a joint statement condemning de Bruyn’s honorary doctorate.

It is not the first time there has been opposition to de Bruyn being given an accolade. At the ACTU congress in 2015 he was poised to receive the ‘meritorious service award’ for his union work. It was pulled at the last minute ‘because of outrage over his stance on gay marriage and his union’s approach to industrial agreements’, according to the Australian.

The day after the graduation debacle, an ACU academic told the ABC Melbourne afternoon presenter Ali Moore that graduates were in tears and had to be consoled. In a statement ACU vice-chancellor Zlatko Skrbis said the university would offer a full refund of graduation fees to all students and provide counselling services to graduates and staff. He also pointed out that graduation speeches usually focus ‘on the efforts and achievements of graduates’. In response to questions put to him by the Australian, he added that the university respects the views the graduation attendees who ‘have said that it wasn’t the right time and place to focus so heavily on religious doctrine, particularly for many people in the room who are not Catholic’.

ACU accepts students of any faith or no religion, but at the same time offers a university education through the lens of Catholic traditions. All students are required to do core curriculum subjects from either the Catholic social thought stream or philosophy, which deals with issues relevant to Catholic thought. The university’s website states: ‘Catholic Social Thought has informed the development of universal approaches to human rights and justice in the 20th and 21st centuries. It is closely aligned with the most fundamental principles of many of the world’s religions and has influenced the codes of practice for many of our professions.’

 

'Can a Catholic institution, striving to embody both traditional Catholic values and a modern pluralistic ethos, uphold its foundational beliefs while also embracing the diverse, often opposing, perspectives of its students and faculty?'

 

These core subjects reflect the university’s delicate balancing act of maintaining a Catholic identity, while also catering to students and who have no connection to Catholic traditions. When I was a sessional lecturer at the university between 2020 and 2022, I observed ACU’s Melbourne campus celebrating Pride Week.

It’s a similar balancing act Catholic public hospitals face. However, the hospitals such as the Mercy (public) Hospital in Melbourne have clear statements on abortions. ‘Mercy Hospital for Women does not offer direct termination of pregnancy,’ the hospital says on its website. ‘We respect every woman’s right to follow her conscience in medical decisions, including her right to request a termination of pregnancy. In order to achieve the best possible outcome we will ensure she has all the information she needs to attend another facility that will provide her with appropriate counselling and clinical services to help her with her final decision and provide ongoing support. If a woman’s life is in danger we will always provide life-saving treatment even if the unintended consequence is the loss of her baby.’

The fallout from the graduation ceremony goes beyond the immediate reactions. ACU will have to contend with the longer-term implications of this public relations nightmare at a time when fewer students are aspiring to go to university. This is inextricably linked to future students’ perception of the university and their trust in it. Government figures released in September show that the percentage of domestic students beginning undergraduate degrees at Australian universities decreased by 1.8 per cent between 2022 and 2023. There was a 3.6 per cent decrease in other students. Overall, domestic enrolments are at their lowest since 2017, and ACU was not immune.

It remains to be seen whether year 12 students and mature-age students reconsider their choice to study at ACU following de Bruyn’s speech. In this sense, the predicament currently faced by ACU mirrors that of the wider church: the university espouses inclusivity but, if de Bruyn's speech is any indication, still retains elements of more traditional Catholic values – to the extent where a figure invited to speak at a major occasion shares views on a range of issues (particularly to do with women) which rankle many, despite being in line with official church positions.

Regardless, de Bruyn’s positions were not in keeping with the students present, a fact of which the event organisers would have been well aware. In a time where enrolments are rocky across the higher education sector, platforming a figure with a divisive message rather than an inspirational one was imprudent at best. 

This year, ACU awarded honorary doctorates to impressive and thoughtful figures like Susan Pascoe, a commissioner and former head of the Catholic Education Office and Dr Rachael Kohn, the long-time host of ABC Radio National’s The Spirit of Things. My personal favourite is ACU’s awarding of an honorary doctorate to the Wiggles in 2006 for their services to early childhood education. Whomever they approach for the next graduation ceremony, ACU would perhaps do well to present the speaker with a copy of the 165-page ACU Book of Prayer so they can draw inspiration from ‘My Graduation Prayer’, ‘A Prayer of Blessing For Our ACU Students At Graduation’ and ‘Prayers Across Faiths and Denominations’.

Given the role of the university is to navigate the delicate terrain between tradition and progress, ACU’s graduation controversy spotlights a complex and, perhaps, unsustainable point of conflict: Can a Catholic institution, striving to embody both traditional Catholic values and a modern pluralistic ethos, uphold its foundational beliefs while also embracing the diverse, often opposing, perspectives of its students and faculty? Or does this very tension demand that one side ultimately gives way?

 

 


Dr Erica Cervini is a freelance journalist and sessional academic.

Topic tags: Erica Cervini, ACU, University, Politics, Values, Abortion, Catholic, De Bruyn, Graduation

 

 

submit a comment

Existing comments

A Catholic activist speaks in support of Catholic teaching at a Catholic university. Staff and students walk out in protest. The Catholic university then apologises and offers refunds and counselling to those offended by Catholic teaching.

Can anyone imagine a Greens activist speaking in support of action on climate change at a Greens conference, Greens members walking out in protest and the Greens then apologising and offering membership fee refunds and counselling to those offended by Greens policies? I thought not.

It truly is a mad, mad, mad, mad world.


Chris Curtis | 16 November 2024  
Show Responses

I'm intrigued by Chris' view of the place of the Church in the world. A great admirer of the assiduous nature of his work on the Gonski Review, I introduced him to Eureka Street, knowing that he himself never darkens the doors of a Catholic (still less any other) church.

The only sense I can make of his throwaway remark is that Chris' great gift is that he is a concrete thinker with an impressive commitment, like Dickens' Mr Gradgrind ('Hard Times, 1854) to 'facts, facts & even more facts'.

Much else fell into place, such as his love of animals and his lifelong commitment to teaching in state schools. This helped considerably in locating another missing piece of the jigsaw puzzle that Catholics who disagree with them mistakenly call fundamentalism and which may simply be the inability to see.

The same may well be observed of Mr O'Rourke, who clearly regards Catholic Social Teaching, not as a set of principles upon the bones of which the Church periodically updates it teaching, in precisely the same way in which Butler adds to her discourse in terms of an equally strong commitment to equality, now a century & a half old.


Michael Furtado | 23 November 2024  

I'm starting to think the latter, one side gives way. Let's be honest, it's most usually the Catholic side. I recently helped an ACU education student with an assignment and I got a taste of how much ground has already been lost. There may be some nominal 'Catholic social teaching' element, but the reality is that the assumptions of people like Judith Butler on the issue of gender are now baked into the curriculum. They are not presented as one of several possible views but are taught as dogma. The ship has sailed. The fact that students are having a sook about hearing what were once pretty standard views on abortion demonstrates that Catholics in Australia have followed the path of quiet cowardice for a long time now.


Josh O'Rourke | 16 November 2024  

The two responses that Dr Cervini got perfectly expose a chink in her commentary. The Catholic Church is a large and complex series of entities with interests and activities which, when played out in the real world, may not cohere with other aspects of its remit that may not suit the individual partisan interests of its members.

The Australian Catholic University is a public university, unable to discriminate in a sector with competing interests and a staff & student body drawn from several disciplines and across all sections of the globe. While certain historical and cultural factors associated with ACU privilege aspects of its identity, it is an institution dedicated to free speech and reflective of a complex pluralistic culture of immense diversity of opinion and values and according to which the magisterial positions of both Messrs Curtis & O'Rourke exert no justified overarching sway.

Granted that De Bruyn had an entitlement to his say, it is doubtful if the Vice-Chancellor undertook his duty of due discretion and cleared the speech beforehand of his invited guest. Had he done so, even the most avid antiabortionist & champion of Catholic Social Teaching as myself might have advised against such a provocation.


Michael Furtado | 30 November 2024  
Show Responses

'even the most avid antiabortionist & champion of Catholic Social Teaching as myself might have advised against such a provocation.'

What provocation?

Cherry picking between canons isn't following the Canon any more than not following any canon. The Law is a whole cloth. To break one part of it is to break all of it because the tiniest stain on an infinite purity stands out as much as a whole collection of spots and stains on the same purity.

De Bruyn was defending the integrity - the wholeness - of Faith. The walkers-out, in their preciousness, want to apportion Faith and still be regarded as keeping it, a case of wanting simultaneously to eat and have your cake.

https://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/3-4.htm
htpps://biblegateway.com/verse/en/James%202%3A10


roy chen yee | 05 December 2024  

'it is an institution dedicated to free speech and reflective of a complex pluralistic culture of immense diversity of opinion and values and according to which the magisterial positions of both Messrs Curtis & O'Rourke exert no justified overarching sway.'

Free speech is not synonymous with diversity. Conceptually, the two are different.

Free speech is free speech (the existence of a liberty to be true to yourself to others). Diversity is either the many prudential ways of coming to a truth, or a multitude of different ways of expressing a wrong. In either domain, free speech is the investigative tool to separate out for analysis the different strands of wheat within a truth or the different forms of chaff within an untruth because people, being different, reflect a truth in them, or an untruth in them, in different ways of behaving.

For example, if you cherry pick between canonicals, you are being as wrong as, but in a different way, someone who rejects all canonicals. And it takes free speech to point out that the dissimilarity in process leads to the similarity in outcome.


roy chen yee | 05 December 2024  
Join the conversation. Sign up for our free weekly newsletter  Subscribe