Welcome to Eureka Street

back to site

ARTS AND CULTURE

Children's publishing fuelled by nostalgia?

  • 09 January 2008

A strange and rare thing happened the other day: a real live child was seen in the offices of a children's publisher. Little Louis wasn’t there for an editorial meeting or to discuss the cover design for our latest series. Actually he spent the whole time wriggling around and trying to ingest staples. But his presence did start me thinking about the adult-filled world that is children’s publishing.

If kids were running our publishing house, lift-the-flap books wouldn’t be about finding the fat controller, they’d be about finding the hidden chocolates; Miffy would hand out free ice-creams instead of playing peek-a-boo; and Zac Power would take you on his thrilling missions and then give you his iPod to keep.

Kids can’t make all the decisions, not least because every day would be spent at the zoo or on the computer, each meal would begin with hot chips, and bedtime would never, ever come.

There’s nothing radical about an industry run by one group for another; children’s publishing isn’t unique in this way. Pet food is not made by or marketed to our furry friends—although a feline-run factory (powered entirely by the underclass that is the canine species, of course) would be very clean. The managers would spend the day dozing in the sun and hissing when anyone came into the office.

Of course kids' books need to be made by adults. But this inevitably gives rise to a certain generational tension. We were all kids once, and most of us like to think that it wasn’t such a long time ago. More to the point, most of us like to think that kids today are just like we were—only with better computer skills and worse table manners. It’s understandable, then, that children’s publishing is often fuelled by nostalgia. There’s something very reassuring about the idea that what we loved to read will still appeal to kids now. Choosing a brand of food for our pets is less fraught—if any of us were dogs in past lives, most of us can’t recall it—and we are going to make a more or less rational decision based on price, ingredients and the cuteness of the ad. Does it really matter that I was a kid before googling was a daily addiction, when terrorism was what the boys did in class when the teacher wasn’t looking, and a treat was a carob-coated muesli bar? If I loved the adventures of Enid Blyton and the poems of AA Milne, why shouldn’t my child also exclaim raa-ther at opportune moments and giggle at the idea that James James Morrison Morrison