Welcome to Eureka Street

back to site

Bring the second Australia out of the shadows

3 Comments

In the opening of his 1953 novel The Go-Between, novelist L.P. Hartley wrote, ‘The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.’ The same applies to a significant section of our own country in the present day. Certainly, many Australians are comfortable and secure, despite high mortgage rates and rents, and the rising cost of household essentials such as food, energy bills and petrol prices.

But there exists, largely hidden, a second Australia. A very different domain of more than three million people, some 761,000 of them children, for whom interest rates count little because they don’t hold a mortgage, let alone several to cover investment properties. In the main, fuel prices aren’t relevant either, because they can’t afford to own a car.

Especially tragic is the large number of children amongst these ‘have nots’, to use a term I wish was outdated, whose present wellbeing and future prospects, including their physical and emotional wellbeing, and educational opportunities, are seriously compromised through living in impoverished households.

This year’s Anti-Poverty Week (15-27 October) focuses on children, given their utter dependency on Australia’s underfunded welfare system. Impoverished Australians must make a complexity of decisions every day, not only about what food to buy, but how many meals they can actually afford. This might mean skipping breakfast so the kids can take a packed lunch to school. Or so mum or dad can eat at work, because around one-in-four Australians receiving JobSeeker are employed, although often in casual or ‘gig’ jobs that are underpaid and insecure, with few rights or protections.

Being poor means endless trade-offs. It might mean not heating the house in order to save the money needed for a child’s school excursion, because missing out would risk being stigmatised by classmates. Or medical bills. Or that unavoidable necessity the rent, for to skip that can mean jeopardising the home itself and running the risk of everyone becoming homeless.

Citizens of this second Australia are conspicuous in the ABS census figures but almost invisible to most of us. Yet their faces and circumstances are well known to charities such as St Vincent de Paul Society, as our members pay regular home visits, or meet them at food vans, and hear their stories and assist where we can. In addition, the Society provides around $50 million in emergency response support each year.

They are single parents, young people, First Nations people, long-term unemployed and those living with disability or ill-health. All are particularly vulnerable. What they have in common is relying on inadequate social security for income and struggling to maintain an affordable roof over their heads.

 

'If the test of a fair society is measured by how it treats those living in poverty or who are marginalised, then Australia — regarded as one of the world’s richest countries — is failing. A robust safety net is needed, with social equity built into our economy.'

 

Catholic Social Teaching principles are based on cherishing human dignity, solidarity with the needy, and advancing the common good. The final goal is that all members of our society can flourish to their fullest potential. The aim is to create a more just and equitable society by advocating for vulnerable people.

These are the values of Society founders who, two centuries ago in France, showed courageous advocacy on behalf of the vulnerable, the powerless and the many others who needed not just a loaf of bread, but equality under the law.

The latest paper in our suite of advocacy policies grouped under the Let’s Build a Fairer Australia banner focuses on ‘Income Support, Poverty and Debt — why Australia needs proper safety nets’. It welcomes certain Government reforms, such as the establishment of an independent Economic Inclusion Advisory Panel led by the Treasurer and Minister for Social Services and comprising experts to advise on income support payments.

However, a range of reforms need to be made urgently. These include a further increase to the base rate of working age payments to lift recipients out of poverty; income support payments to be indexed biannually in line with wage growth or CPI, whichever is higher; an increase to the earnings threshold of income support recipients by $150 a fortnight (to $300); a broader assessment process for the Disability Support Payment.

Regulating the Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) sector is also a priority. BNPL accounts now total $11.9 billion, often being used on top of existing debts by people in financial difficulty.

Most particularly, we support Anti-Poverty Week’s call for child poverty to be halved by 2030. Growing up in poverty is a strong predictor of a child being developmentally vulnerable by the time they start school. The Productivity Commission found that school children experiencing disadvantage are three times more likely to fall behind than other students.

The question often posed is how we can afford a fairer Australia. The answer lies in policy priorities, as detailed in the report A Fairer Tax and Welfare System that we commissioned from the ANU (covered recently in Eureka Street).

This research showed that the most pressing welfare reforms could be funded by repealing the stage 3 tax cuts, making moderate changes to personal income taxation thresholds, reducing the capital gains tax discount and changing superannuation tax concessions. These changes would reduce the after-housing poverty rate from 11.7 per cent of households to 8.6 per cent, lifting between 193,000 to 834,000 people out of poverty.

If the test of a fair society is measured by how it treats those living in poverty or who are marginalised, then Australia — regarded as one of the world’s richest countries — is failing. A robust safety net is needed, with social equity built into our economy.

 

 

 


Mark Gaetani is National President of the St Vincent de Paul Society.

Main image: (Getty images)

Topic tags: Mark Gaetani, Welfare, Poverty, Taxation, SVDP, Australia

 

 

submit a comment

Existing comments

I would suggest that the best safety net would be a return to belief in God. Even in this godless world which has emerged from the ruins of Judeo-Christian Western society, a global survey conducted by Encyclopaedia Britannica indicates that 80 % of the world population believes in a superior being, a God, not always the God of Judeo-Christianity , but never the less , an all powerful God. Surprisingly, 18% express agnosticism and, despite its trendiness, only 2% of human beings in today's world espouse frank atheism. Perhaps Catholicism might consider returning to belief in Christ as supreme God and therein the recognition of the Christian obligation to the poor and dispossessed rather than adopting the seriously flawed ambitions of the Post -Christian era that pervades our society in this day and age.


John Frawley | 13 October 2023  

I’m extremely grateful Mark for your deep insights into the struggles and difficulties of the more than three million adults and children living in what you quite rightly describe as the “second Australia”.
I also really appreciate the time that both you and the St Vincent de Paul Society dedicate to assisting and advocating for this impoverished section of our nation.
I’m blown away by the fact that your organisation gives more than $50 million in emergency response relief each year. This is incredible, but sadly also an indictment on our country’s so-called safety net for the poor and vulnerable.
I’d also like to ask you, Mark, if the St Vincent de Paul Society would be open to supporting the growing calls for a universal basic income for every Australian. Such a guaranteed income would not eradicate poverty completely I know, but it would give greater security, peace of mind and an increased sense of well being to the millions struggling in the mainly hidden “second Australia."


Robert Van Zetten | 14 October 2023  

Good article Mark.
In a micro sense, Qld is the worst State. With a grandstanding Premier hell bent on tearing down a perfectly good Gabba at a cost of $2.7 bn, and over 300,000 homeless, the $320m from the National housing fund will only build 600 new social housing homes in the next 2 years.
That's madness.
Plenty of modular housing to suit 4 people is available at a fraction of that cost. eg $130k per module. 2 story as well.
Nero fiddles while Rome burns.
$2.7bn (which the Olympic Committee said the Gabba rebuild was not necessary to host the Games) even on the inflated minister for housing figures at $600k per build, would equate to an extra 4500 social housing homes.
If they had any real sense and went modular the flagrant waste of $2.7 bn would build an extra 82,000 modular homes.


Francis Armstrong | 21 October 2023  

Similar Articles

Some things change, some things stay the same

  • David Halliday
  • 13 October 2023

This vote will be remembered as an opportunity for Australians to grapple with the injustices of history, and imagine a more just way forward. My hope is that each person voting will have done just that – and whether they vote ‘yes’ or ‘no’, that they are making their vote bearing in mind what they think will best reconcile our nation’s past and look forward to a more just future.

READ MORE

Pope Francis' lesson for a polarised world: Focus on the process, not the outcome

  • Julian Butler
  • 10 October 2023

Amidst a backdrop of polarized decisions and rising populism, at the Synod on Synodality in Rome, Pope Francis emphasises collaborative listening. As he explores decision-making in religious contexts, could prioritising process over outcome reshape our own current political landscape?

READ MORE