Welcome to Eureka Street

back to site

A tale of two school systems

9 Comments

 

It’s that time of year. Parents all over Australia are agonising over the best school for their child. Advertisements for private schools abound. They picture pretty children in old-style hats – I’m sure you’ve seen them – girls and boys with straight white teeth smile down at us from billboards in Brisbane, Melbourne, Adelaide and beyond.

As a parent, I know how difficult it is to choose a school – that is, if you’re lucky enough to have a choice.

Many regional families and families living on low incomes have only one option and, bafflingly, it is the most disadvantaged public schools in Australia that are the most underfunded.

Schools are more unequal now than they were in 2013 when the Gonski report called for better funding for public schools. The Guardian reports that over the last decade ‘private school funding increased twice as much as public schools’.

My younger child will go to Indooroopilly State High School next year and she’s excited, but because of its popularity the school is over-capacity by about 700 students. More than 40 per cent of students live out of area. Families here, as in many cities in Australia, often rent a unit for six months, enroll their child in the desired school, then move somewhere affordable. Who can blame them? But this means that the areas they live in are leached of the best students and the ‘good’ public schools are overcrowded. At Indooroopilly, girls spend half their lunch break waiting in line for the toilet because there aren’t enough amenities. Students no longer do science experiments because the science lab is needed as another classroom. It’s hard to find a place in the shade – away from the blazing Queensland sun – to eat lunch.  

Meanwhile, next door, St. Peters Lutheran College has fewer students and is nearly twice the size – a ‘leafy 21 hectares’. This private school has ‘state-of-the-art music facilities, comprehensive sports programs’, two swimming pools and plans for a third.

St. Peters costs nearly $20,000 for year 7. That’s nothing compared to the Anglican school, Geelong Grammar. They’ve just announced that school fees for years 10-12 will go up to $49,720 a year.

 

'According to 2018 findings by the OECD, once the differences in ‘economic, social and cultural status’ are accounted for, public school students outperform private school students in Australia.'

 

Why is the taxpayer funding these schools?

The Australian government spends more money on private schools than the U.S. or the U.K. We also have a higher percentage of kids enrolled in private schools – in the U.S. 91 per cent of kids are in public school, in the U.K. it’s 93 per cent. In Australia only 64.5 per cent of kids attend public school. Private school enrollments in Australia increase as kids get older: 42 per cent of secondary students go to private school.

I did an informal survey of the parents I know, asking about their school choice. The ones who’ve chosen private school told me that their childrens’ school is safe, quiet and there is more support than in the public system.

But this isn’t the case for children with disabilities. 75 per cent of children with disabilities (including my own elder daughter) go to public school. And it’s not true for kids with behavioral issues, who are kicked out of private school or not accepted in the first place.

One friend took her daughter out of the public system in year 8 and sent her to a private school until ‘it became clear that the attention was really going to be given to the high achievers . . . and once again she was falling through the cracks. This time at a cost we could barely afford. She’s back at the big public school now and doing better socially and emotionally.’ 

Interestingly, another friend, a devout Christian, eschewed a religious education in favour of the local state school for her four boys. When asked why, she explained that she wants her kids ‘to be in the world, to have tenderness and compassion and love just like Jesus for all types of people, even when we might have different values’.

I must admit that when my younger child was having a hard time, I considered the local Montessori. I love how their approach to learning is child-led. Their classrooms are quiet, there are no kids with behavioral issues and the grounds are beautiful, shaded by giant fig trees.

My child is easily distracted and if I sent her to school in Fig Tree Pocket (even the suburb sounds magical!) she might have an easier time. But she’d miss out on the diversity of children from different backgrounds. And it would cost nearly half my yearly income.

And school isn’t meant to be easy, is it? Sometimes it’s hard, just like the rest of life. That can be a good thing.

Education expert, Jane Caro cites research showing that ‘graduates of public schools who go to university outperform both their selective school and their private school peers by an average of five marks. They’re more likely to stay; they’re more likely to graduate.’ I see this in the classroom at the University of Queensland, where I teach. It’s often the students coming from private schools who become overwhelmed and drop out.

According to 2018 findings by the OECD, once the differences in ‘economic, social and cultural status’ are accounted for, public school students outperform private school students in Australia.

All evidence points to private schools not offering a superior education, just a more luxurious one. Surely it’s time for the taxpayer to stop subsidising swimming pools at private schools, and put that money into the most underfunded public schools. 

 

 

 


Sarah Klenbort is a writer and sesional academic at Queensland University, where she teaches creative writing. She also teaches memoir at the Queensland Writers Centre. Sarah's work has appeared in Eureka Street, The Guardian, Best Australian Stories, Overland and other publications here and overseas.

Main image: Getty images

Topic tags: Sarah Klenbort, Education, Schools, Public, Private, Students

 

 

submit a comment

Existing comments

Close to my daughter’s home in Adelaide there is a high school, once avoided by the majority of parents nearby as a ‘suitable’ school for their children, but which retained a small, dedicated group of people who wanted the situation turned around. With the school facing closure, that group rallied and fought. Now the school has a new name and is building a reputation for excellence in education. Sometimes parents can forget how resilient children can be, how they can respond to adversity and how good it is for young people to find their own place.


Pam | 12 October 2023  

Please come and visit one of our EREA Flexi Schools that work with young people who have been disenfranchised from mainstream education. Love you to understand and write about this vital part of our educational landscape.


Gerard Ian Keating | 13 October 2023  

Klenbort raises a familiar cry about unjust school outcomes but lacking the kind of solution-based analysis expected of Eureka Street. In sum she repeats aspects of the publicity campaign run by Jane Caro on behalf of the Australian Education Union with the human addition of citing her family's experience.

This makes her article a useful start to Catholic and other parents developing a policy conversation about the dominant narrative pushed by various non-government-school Parents & Friends Associations, lamentably focused on uncritically toeing the established private-school-providing 'party-line'.

When, at a P&F national conference the federal minister proudly boasted that Catholic schools were at the forefront of inclusion and exemplars of how private providers challenged the AEU's well-established stereotype, I asked, in connection with my post-doctoral research, why he wouldn't fully-fund Catholic schools, to which he replied that parents wouldn't like it.

The reputational cost of current funding policy to all schools, Catholic and otherwise, in dodging the social and cultural burden of the inclusion manifestly more evident in state schools, is scandalously high.

It manifests itself in time wasted on trivial matters such as the treatment of trans kids at a time when Pope Francis himself advocates for 'widening the tent'!


Michael Furtado | 13 October 2023  

Thank you very much Sarah for your passionate, open response to the terribly unfair school funding situation in Australia.

It must be extremely difficult for those parents lucky enough to have a choice, to decide which school into which they should enrol their children.

This decision is made even harder by the “guilt” type manipulative advertising done by the over funded private school sector.

Sarah, you make a very powerful moral argument about government funding when you state that the “evidence points to private schools not offering a superior education, just a more luxurious one.”

It’s time underfunded public schools in Australia were properly funded by both state and federal governments.

For readers who agree with you and want to speak out about the current injustice in education funding I recommend the website - foreverychild.au - a community of parents, carers, teachers, and others advocating for full and fair funding for every child in Australian schools.


Robert Van Zetten | 13 October 2023  
Show Responses

Robert,

I checked foreverychild.au and it is not “advocating for full and fair funding for every child in Australian schools.” It us advocating for the children in government schools only. It is run by the AEU, which did not even put a funding model to the original Gonski panel. In fact, no one in the public education lobby did. The only model the panel got was mine. That model based funding on an explicit staffing ratio. I tried to get both the AEU and IEU to support it. After all, you would think they’d be interested in teacher workload. They weren’t interested, and here we are, almost 11 years after the release of the Gonski report, with a bad funding model, though I note that Lindsay Connors has just recommended a similar funding approach
(https://johnmenadue.com/mirror-mirror-on-the-wall/.


Chris Curtis | 17 October 2023  

Smart kids with smart parents do well no matter where they attend school.


John Frawley | 13 October 2023  

The author states, “Schools are more unequal now than they were in 2013 when the Gonski report called for better funding for public schools. The Guardian reports that over the last decade ‘private school funding increased twice as much as public schools’.” The latter is not evidence for the former. The non-government sector has had a higher percentage increase than the government sector, just as people on the minimum wage had a higher percentage increase than people on other award wages, but the non-government sector started from a lower base. In fact, non-government schools receive public funding of only $12,442 per student compared with $20,940 for a government school student (Table 4A.14 Real Australian, State and Territory government recurrent expenditure per student, Productivity Commission, Report on Government Services 2023 - updated as of 6/6/2023), a gap of $8,498 in favour of government schools.

The author asks, “Why is the taxpayer funding these schools?”
The taxpayer funds these schools for the same reason that it funds non-government doctors, non-government pharmacists, non-government kindergartens: that’s how society at large has organised things via the democratic political process in the knowledge that public purposes can be met by non-government entities.


Chris Curtis | 17 October 2023  

The author states, “The Australian government spends more money on private schools than the U.S. or the U.K. We also have a higher percentage of kids enrolled in private schools – in the U.S. 91 per cent of kids are in public school, in the U.K. it’s 93 per cent. In Australia only 64.5 per cent of kids attend public school.” This misleading because the UK fully finds non-government schools that do not charge fees and admit disadvantaged students first. 11 per cent of the UK’s primary students attend non-government schools, as do 52 per cent of lower secondary students and 74 per cent of upper secondary students (OECD Education at a Glance 2015, Table C1.4a).

The author states, “Surely it’s time for the taxpayer to stop subsidising swimming pools at private schools, and put that money into the most underfunded public schools.” The government does not fund swimming pools. They are funded exclusively by parents.


Chris Curtis | 17 October 2023  

Most OECD countries fund non-government schools, but, as far as I can make out, none does so on the basis that Australia does. Finland, which we are regularly told has no non-government schools, fully funds them but bans them from charging fees. The average OECD spending is $US10,949 per student in a government school and $US7,958 per student in a non-government school, with the latter being 72.7 per cent of the former. (OECD Education at a Glance 2023, Table C1.2. Public and total expenditure on educational institutions per full-time equivalent student, by type of institution (2020), in equivalent USD converted using PPPs for GDP, direct expenditure)


Chris Curtis | 17 October 2023