A- A A+

It's more than a game to LGBTI football fans

3 Comments
Neve Mahoney |  07 February 2017

 

Growing up in Victoria, AFL was unavoidable. It would worm its way into my Friday and Saturday nights. Accepting a lift from my dad meant listening to AM radio with men talking about the latest footy drama.

Rainbow flag and AFL footballsThen once a year, in September, there was Footy Day. I would dress up in my mother's red and white, parade around and make the all-important choice between a meat pie or sausage roll. (I'm a 'both' kind of girl.)

Now we finally have AFLW. It was a long time coming, and the large turnout to the opening Collingwood vs Carlton game disputed the perception that no one is interested in women's sports.

The inclusion of the AFLW does raise questions for me, however, regarding the changes that will need to occur within the AFL, as well as our broader footy culture, to become more inclusive of LGBTI people.

In the AFLW, there are many players who have same sex relationships and are out. But in the men's leagues there have been only two players, Jason Ball, who played for Yarra Glen, and Rhyian Anderson-Morley, who plays for the Yarraville Seddon Eagles.

Ball remains active in advocating for LGBTI rights. The Huffington Post quotes him challenging the AFL to do more than just 'symbolic gestures', to put their money where their mouth is and 'invest in education' for players and clubs on the issues LGBTI sportspeople face.

You do have to wonder why not one AFL player on the elite level has come out, despite the head of AFL football operations Mark Evans saying the AFL is 'ready' to welcome a gay player.

Last year, I attended the AFL Pride Match with the LGBTI youth group Minus18. In the lead-up to the match, anti-same sex marriage protesters had flyered spectators' cars at a VFL game. I was aware of this as I walked to Etihad Stadium, but still there was something profoundly emotional about seeing rainbows mix with football colours. A huge part of my childhood was no longer alienated from my lived reality.

 

"In a 2016 survey of 363 AFL footballers 10.3 per cent agreed with the statement 'gay males sicken me because they are not real men'. Obviously there is work to be done."

 

It wasn't a perfect experience. The announcer's opening remark, 'Welcome ladies, gentlemen and everyone else who hasn't decided yet', raised eyebrows among the trans and non-binary people in the Minus18 group. As the game went on like any other, the whole experience recast itself. I felt more and more conspicuous, and I wondered how safe I'd feel if I were watching alone, waving a rainbow flag. The rainbows on the field became a sad sort of metaphor — painted on only for a day and then gone. It was hard not to feel like all of this decoration was tokenistic.

A 2015 Out of the Fields study showed 80 per cent of Australian respondents thought LGBTI people weren't accepted by the sporting community and had personally experienced or witnessed homophobia in sport. The AFL have taken some steps, like its video campaign for the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia. Even so, in a 2016 survey of 363 AFL footballers 10.3 per cent agreed with the statement 'gay males sicken me because they are not real men'. Obviously there is work to be done.

The Out of the Fields study also shows that the majority of the homophobia takes place in the stands, with 75 per cent of respondents saying that a LGBTI person would not be safe at a sporting event. So this is not just the job of the AFL, but of everyone in the sporting community. It will take many steps to change the culture. In Victoria particularly, we need to address the fact that a sporting code that some describe as being 'like a religion' is still deeply rooted in a white, heterocentric patriarchal mindset.

This will involve an enforced zero tolerance policy on homophobic (and racist, for that matter) sledging. It will be replacing the gendered terms like WAGs and embracing the lesbian AFLW and gay AFL players. It will be accepting a diversified commentary, so that panels are no longer a convention for heterosexual white men. When the homophobia is occurring within the stands, it will be up to everyone to call out these instances, to make footy stadiums safe places for LGBTI people.

These changes are necessary for football players but also for LGBTI fans. I speak from personal experience when I say that a silent ally is not an ally. In sporting communities it is imperative that LGBTI people know they are welcome. It should not be up to LGBTI people to force their way into the football culture. Footy culture needs to redefine itself to include LGBTI people.

 


Neve MahoneyNeve Mahoney is a student at RMIT university. She has also contributed to Australian Catholics and The Big Issue.

 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

As always - an interesting and thoughtful read. I particularly liked the comment 'a silent ally is not an ally'! Exactly what Henry VIII argued with Sir Thomas Moore.

Irena North 10 February 2017

For me, the rainbow flag represents an acceptance and celebration of diversity - which includes ALL (including the heterosexual majority) - so I would never feel comfortable sitting in a separate group of a sporting stadium waving a flag to tell people that I'm sexually attracted to men. I've worked in 2 places where it was common for younger guys to reveal they were gay on first introduction - and I never felt the need to do that. Not that I'm ashamed of it, but at work or on the sporting field - I'm just me. And to me, heterosexuals are just as mysterious to me as transexuals are - so I see the LGBTSI conglomerate a bit arbitrary and potentially undermines the acceptance of diversity it seeks to achieve.

AURELIUS 13 February 2017

Aurelius, your post would make more sense were you to consider the issues of power and privilege that underpin the case Neve Mahoney makes for sporting inclusion. White heterosexist standards are fundamentally unjust when those who behave as if these are the norm fail to critique the prerogative they exercise which has a silencing effect on the participation of others of difference. Inclusion is very much the hallmark of a contemporary social justice discourse and Eureka Street is to be congratulated for giving this courageous writer the opportunity to express her epistemic voice in what is just about the only Australian Catholic journal that would carry such a piece.

Dr Michael Furtado 27 March 2017

Similar articles

Horror year of state care abuse justifies intervention

10 Comments
Oliver Jacques | 27 January 2017

Broken Homes logo from ABC Four CornersAllowing the Catholic Church to investigate itself was once described by an abuse victim as akin to 'putting Dracula in charge of a blood bank'. The Church now largely accepts the value of outside scrutiny, and has even endorsed a national redress scheme that would subject it to independent examination of its complaint handling and treatment of victims. But there is another institution - plagued by rampant child abuse in 2016 - where the vampires in charge are still trusted to mop up the blood.


Maintaining children's rights amid youth detention crises

4 Comments
Kate Galloway | 13 January 2017

Dylan Jenkings is a former NT youth detainee who is part of a class action suing the Government.The Minister has committed to improving youth detention facilities, the appointment of 100 more staff, and revision of Victoria's youth detention policy. But in doing so, she has sheeted home blame to the former government, and has accused lawyers for the children of pandering to ideology. The government's discourse continues the tough-on-crime narrative rather than acknowledging the causes and contexts of juvenile offending and the consequences of appalling facilities on the youth who are detained.


Punitive truth behind Dutton's 'sham marriage' furphy

14 Comments
Kerry Murphy | 11 November 2016

Peter Dutton'We're not going to allow people who have sought to come by boat to come to Australia through a backdoor and we are not going to allow sham marriages to facilitate that,' said Peter Dutton. Given all the existing checks and hurdles, why have a ban? It would only affect about 2000 people; the other 35,000 who came by boat before 19 July 2013 or were not sent to Nauru and Manus Island are not affected. The true intention is to further punish the people we dumped on our Pacific neighbours.


Watching the 'mixed bag' Senate cross bench at work

4 Comments
John Warhurst | 05 December 2016

Derryn HinchTo say the Senate cross bench is a mixed bag is an understatement. All that is really lacking is an extreme left senator unrestrained by Labor/Green discipline. Amid all the controversy I've grown comfortable with their place in the Senate and appreciative of their collective presence in an otherwise party dominated chamber. They each have their flaws, but they make a generally positive contribution to public discussion and to ultimate legislative outcomes. We are better off for their presence.


The problem of privilege in Australia Day billboard furore

16 Comments
Tseen Khoo | 24 January 2017

Girls in hijabs waving Australian flagsThe removal of an Australia Day billboard featuring two girls in hijabs prompted a swell of support against Islamophobia. Alongside this was a backlash from those who read the action as forcing Muslim Australians to be complicit in the oppression of Indigenous peoples. My unease came from seeing intra-community tension manifest as dismissal and denigration of those who were considered not 'woke' enough to the politics and embedded racism surrounding invocations of Australian identity.