Welcome to Eureka Street

back to site

The week America betrayed Ukraine and itself

 

On Friday, in what should have been a routine diplomatic meeting in the Oval Office, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was subjected to something that looked much closer to an ambush than a diplomatic discussion around ceasefires and rare earth minerals. Seated across from President Trump, flanked by Vice President J.D. Vance, rising star of the isolationist right and one of the most vocal opponents of continued U.S. aid to Ukraine, Zelensky had come to Washington seeking assurances. His mission was straightforward: to secure the support his country needs to withstand Russia’s ongoing invasion and to remind the United States of the promises it made to protect Ukraine’s sovereignty. Instead, before a bank of cameras and a captive global audience, he found himself cornered.

What unfolded was more political theatre than diplomacy. Towards the end of the 50-minute meeting, Trump and Vance pressed Zelensky with accusations casting him as ungrateful and reckless, a foreign leader exploiting American generosity while dragging the United States toward global catastrophe. On live television, they prodded him to admit that U.S. support for Ukraine risked triggering a wider war. When Zelensky refused the premise, when he pushed back against the distortions and steered the conversation to the principles at stake, and to Ukraine’s right to defend itself and the security guarantees pledged long ago, his hosts shifted tactics. They moved from interrogation to condescension, leaving Zelensky to sit, tight-lipped and composed, as the subtext became plain: America’s patience  — and more importantly its chequebook balance — had run out.

Watching the spectacle, I was reminded of a moment from twelve years ago. It was late 2013, during the height of the EuroMaidan protests in Kyiv, Ukraine’s most determined and defining stand against Moscow’s influence. What began as a rejection of the Kremlin’s grip over the Ukrainian government soon transformed into a national declaration of independence, not only from Moscow’s dominance but from the post-Soviet decay that had kept Ukraine trapped in a state of limbo. Independence Square — Maidan in Ukrainian — became the uprising’s epicentre.

For thirteen weeks, over the course of that brutally cold winter, as many as 800,000 protesters held their ground in the heart of the city amid sub-zero temperatures and brutal crackdowns. To keep riot police at bay, they built barricades of tires and set them ablaze with gasoline-filled bottles, creating a thick, impenetrable smokescreen. Layers of ash raised the square’s ground level by three feet, while frozen pools formed where police fire hoses had extinguished the flames.

At one point during those freezing days, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland appeared among the protesters, handing out cookies in a symbolic gesture of solidarity. Her visit came just a day after Secretary of State John Kerry delivered a forceful statement: “The United States stands with the people of Ukraine. They deserve better.” For a brief moment, it felt as though Washington meant it.

It was a three-month battle between Ukrainians and a pro-Kremlin government — one that seemed, at the time, to end in total victory for the people.

When the clashes finally ceased, Independence Square resembled a battlefield. The air was filled with the scent of burning tires. Ash and frozen pools covered the ground. Among the rubble lay forgotten Molotov cocktails, their rags still stoppered in bottles while dark patches of clotted blood stained the cobblestones.

 

'Trump and Vance may not have been interested in that history, or in honouring those promises made by the West — promises of sovereignty, of security, of survival. But the truth is, Ukraine’s struggle will not end until those promises are kept.'

 

Shrines sprang up for the fallen. Photographs of those who died — mostly men, young and old, smiling or solemn — were tacked onto makeshift memorials. They became known as the “Heavenly Hundred.”

I remember the feeling of being watched as I passed their faces, their still eyes frozen in those pictures. I also remember stopping by a ragged tent, dropping money into a donation box, and asking the scruffy men inside what they planned to do next, now that everything was over.

“None of this is over,” they replied in unison. “It’s only the beginning.”

They were not prophets, but they knew. They knew everything, even then.

I don’t know what happened to those guys. But sometimes I think they’re still there. At times, it feels as if they linger, hidden among the countless blue and yellow flags now planted in the soil of Independence Square, each inscribed with the name of a fallen Ukrainian soldier. Their families placed them in remembrance, a tribute to lives lost. Now, the flags stretch like a vast sea before the Independence Monument, a stark reminder that the cost of Ukraine’s independence is still being paid.

This, I believe, is what President Volodymyr Zelensky was trying to convey last Friday in the Oval Office seeking justice, only to be ambushed in a grotesque spectacle.

It seemed as if Trump and J.D. Vance, seated in their positions of power beside Zelensky, were working from a shared script, goading him into a misstep that could be used against him. The strategy was transparent: paint Zelensky as “ungrateful” on live television, further eroding American sympathy for Ukraine and laying the rhetorical groundwork for the inevitable withdrawal of U.S. financial aid.

Trump, eager to appease Putin and refocus America’s strategic attention on containing China, waited for Zelensky to falter. And for a time, Zelensky navigated the tightrope skillfully, expressing gratitude for past aid while refusing to accept outright lies about the war. Again and again, he steered the conversation back to what mattered: the need for a real security guarantee, the one the Western world had promised thirty years ago but never delivered.

In 1994, Ukraine surrendered its post-Soviet nuclear arsenal as part of the Budapest Memorandum to prevent nuclear proliferation. In exchange, the United States, Britain, France, and Russia pledged to safeguard Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. That agreement was supposed to be a bulwark against precisely the kind of invasion Ukraine now endures. It obviously failed.

Now, one hundred thousand dead Ukrainians, perhaps more, are testament to the emptiness of words without action. Zelensky tried to remind Trump of this and was promptly shown the door.

Zelensky had every right to remind his American hosts of the Budapest Memorandum. But they weren’t listening. Instead, they accused him of “gambling with World War Three,” a naked falsehood meant to deflect blame away from the real instigator of the war, Vladimir Putin. The irony was impossible to ignore. Trump, a man who openly admires Putin and who attempted to subvert American democracy, was branding the leader of a democratic nation fighting for its survival as a “dictator.”

The American audience watching at home may not have noticed the deeper implications. But in Ukraine, the response was immediate. Rather than blaming Zelensky for the humiliation, Ukrainians were outraged at the position of the White House. They perceived the meeting as a calculated affront to their leader, who was earnestly seeking support from the United States. It was seen as an intentional humiliation; a message from Washington to Kyiv. The message: You’re on your own.

And the Oval Office debacle was only part of the message. Just days earlier, the United States, alongside Russia and North Korea, voted against a United Nations resolution condemning Russian aggression in Ukraine. It was an astonishing moment. Not just a diplomatic embarrassment, but a signal that the rules-based order the United States helped build after World War II is beginning to collapse. America, once the self-appointed leader of the free world, now finds itself voting with dictatorships and turning its back on the very principles it once claimed to stand for.

The American public, for its part, seems ambivalent. A recent poll found that only 51 per cent support continued military aid to Ukraine. Nearly half of Americans are indifferent to the fate of Europe. Increasingly, they are hostile not only to their adversaries but to their allies. It is a return to the isolationist, transactional politics of the 1940s, driven by economic decline and a dwindling appetite for global leadership. For decades, Washington has searched for ways to minimize its financial obligations to NATO, a search that can be traced back to the Nixon administration.

For Ukraine, the meaning of the Oval Office meeting was clear: the security guarantees of 1994 meant nothing. Justice, it turns out, is too expensive for the United States. Trump and Vance may not have been interested in that history, or in honouring those promises made by the West — promises of sovereignty, of security, of survival. But the truth is, Ukraine’s struggle will not end until those promises are kept.

 

 


Sergey Maidukov is a Ukrainian writer, author of Life on the run and Deadly bonds, written for the US publishing house Rowman & Littlefield (Bloomsbury). Both were written in English, in the midst of war. His journalism has appeared in numerous Western publications.

Main image: U.S. President Donald Trump (C) and Vice President JD Vance meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office at the White House on February 28, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump and Zelensky are meeting today to negotiate a preliminary agreement on sharing Ukraine’s mineral resources that Trump says will allow America to recoup aid provided to Kyiv while supporting Ukraine’s economy. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

 

 

submit a comment

Existing comments

Thank you for this fine reflection. The news tonight related how America is cutting its intelligence support for Ukraine. The betrayal is deepening. It is so good to have considered comment like yours. I feel sincere sorrow and admiration for all Ukrainian people including yourself, and I look at your President and know humanity has hope.


Susan Connelly | 06 March 2025  

Like him or loath him, Donald Trump is the validly elected President of the USA and will remain so for the remainder of his 4 year term. Agree or disagree with his wrecking ball approach to both his domestic and his international policies, it makes no difference. The remedies are beyond our jurisdiction but I take heart that over 50% of the American population are horrified and embarrassed by the behaviour of their Chief Executive and plans are being made and alliances formed on both sides of American politics to ameliorate the worst possible outcomes to some of his rash and ill-considered Executive Orders. It has been even suggested by some , that Trump the professional entertainer is actually ‘playing up to his audience’ knowing full well that the ‘Deep State’ which he says exists within the Federal bureaucracy will bring them all to naught. That would validate his claim to have an IQ of over 150 ( which I doubt). I believe his true measure lies in his extraordinary ability in the art of ‘rat cunning’ but that is ‘by the by’. Whatever solution there may be to the Trump problem will be found by the American people, not us!
We are largely on our own. Pity about that huge sum of money we recently sent to the USA as down payment for a Virginia Class nuclear submarine under the AUKUS agreement! We’ll never see THAT money again, but we can rely on their interest in keeping the Chinese at bay in the Pacific and we are really off the US teat at last and can pursue an independent foreign policy in our own ‘transactional’ interests.
I consider that a good outcome.


William Stockwell | 06 March 2025  

Today's headline in 'The Shovel': 'Average Ukrainian IQ soars as Americans withdraw their intelligence'.


Peter Breen | 07 March 2025  

Foreign affairs officials in Kyiv might want to ponder the question of why, to America, Ukraine is not Israel ---- while similar officials in Tel Aviv with an eye to the long-term ponder (as I'm sure they are doing already) why, to America, Israel is not Ukraine.

One hopes on trust, because some information needs to be kept from public view, that still other foreign affairs officials in Canberra are pondering when and why Australia may or may not be one or the other.


roy chen yee | 09 March 2025  

If the US was expected to continue funding a war that’s already lost, and which has made no progress either way for at least twelve months, it’s not their President who’s a bit dim. He’s always been transparent about his intentions. Thank god Zelensky seems to have had second thoughts. And Trump’s intention of forcing Europe and Britain to step up seems to be working, too.


Joan Seymour | 09 March 2025  

Betrayal is a misnomer. The US has given 175 billion in defense and weapons.
Only Europe has pledged more.
Trump has a point on the Rare Earths mining issue proposal.
If US signs the agreement and US mining companies do commence extraction there, the murderous thug Putin will not jeopardize the operations. He is not a complete fool.
I think the whole war could be swiftly terminated if NATO finally approved Ukraine membership.


Francis Armstrong | 10 March 2025  

The problem with the MAGA principle is that it is Christian in veneer rather than in substance.

Veneer is better than nothing but the eyes of a principle which has Christianity in its bones will not have missed the bleedingly obvious spiritual and cultural identity of both US and Ukraine as Christian nations, jointly bound by the same biblical mandate that Christians are supposed to love each other, in fact, not merely to love but to prefer each other (with the same border-managing zeal of St. Paul) over others.

This can be seen in the weird choice of mediator between Ukraine and the US of a Gulf State and not an emissary chosen from some kind of joint choice of the Orthodox Communion and the American Protestant fraternities.

St Paul would consider 1.) the US-Ukraine dispute to be shameful and 2.) the choice of a representative of an alien spirituality as mediator to be more so. Dirty laundry between Christians should be sorted by Christians.

Shameful also is that, for some reason, perhaps blindness, perhaps cowardice, no entity of the Church Militant is telling the MAGA principle that it is being a naked emperor when it comes to US-Ukraine.


roy chen yee | 10 March 2025  

Similar Articles

Can justice survive in a divided world?

  • Andrew Hamilton
  • 26 February 2025

Amid debates over inclusion, dignity, and the rule of law, how do entrenched power structures shape our futures, and can renewed commitment to cooperation mend a divided society?

READ MORE

Cheques and (power) balances reshape aid in a post-liberal world

  • Cameron Hill
  • 26 February 2025

With cuts to USAID, international aid programs confront mounting challenges. Amid evolving power dynamics and strategic realignment, humanitarian assistance now faces fundamental questions about its future.

READ MORE
Join the conversation. Sign up for our free weekly newsletter  Subscribe