Putting the 'how' and 'why' questions aside, Julia Gillard has made history. After 26 male incumbents, Australia now has one female prime minister. It is heartening to know that women have now broken down almost every barrier to full participation in national life.
Gillard will recognise her debt to the many women who achieved steps along the way to the top political job: those who persevered to win party endorsements as candidates, to survive as backbenchers as small minorities and to perform admirably in ministerial roles, have made the tasks of those coming after them a little easier. All Australian women have cause to celebrate this victory.
But the celebrations over Gillard's achievement cannot go on forever. She will be the first to recognise that she now has to get on with the job of restoring public confidence in the Government. While she will be remembered forever as the first woman to become Australian prime minister, Gillard will also seek to be remembered as one of the finest.
If electing a woman to the top job is to remain important, then Gillard needs to imbue her performance with some unique qualities. She has the opportunity to demonstrate something special in both political style and policy substance.
A good deal has been written about Rudd's abrasive style. Critics found him verbose and consequently remote from ordinary people. They also remarked on his tendency to claim the moral high ground in a manner that appeared rather puritanical. His statements on the fates of the Bali bombers and photographs of young girls seemed to be unnecessarily severe.
In this regard he resembled his Liberal predecessor closely, and his victory speech after the 2007 election was ominously reminiscent of John Howard's in 1996. It is difficult to attribute the Government's apparent loss of popularity wholly to Rudd's leadership, but claims that an inner circle of a few senior ministers and youthful advisers dominated policy suggest that he was seen as dictatorial.
Clearly, Gillard and her deputy Wayne Swan will ignore these criticisms at their peril. They were part of the small team Rudd headed so it is difficult for outsiders to appreciate how they can distance themselves from Rudd's legacy. There needs to be more consensus style, but at the same time, they need to make some firm decisions and end impressions that the Government is afraid to move against the wishes of the middle ground.
On