Welcome to Eureka Street

back to site

A time for risk and a time for caution: Albanese’s dilemma

8 Comments

 

Over the last ten months or so, it has become commonly accepted wisdom in Canberra that Labor is hurtling towards minority government. Peter Dutton has too high a mountain to climb, so the theory goes, to catapult back into office after one term because the Coalition parties must win back 21 seats to claim majority government. But Anthony Albanese and Labor? Too cautious, too timid, they don’t stand for much and haven’t done much, have they?

Albanese’s baffling move to drop $4.3 million on a home for himself and fiancé Jody Haydon has been interpreted as further evidence that the Prime Minister’s famed political radar is not what it once. As one of his ‘gobsmacked’ colleagues told me last week, ‘I can’t think of a greater act of self-sabotage in my life’. One by one, cabinet colleagues were rolled out to defend Albanese’s judgment and his right to purchase a home. 

And sure, he is as entitled as any other person to buy a home and enjoy the fruits of his labours. Given his log cabin story — the boy who grew up with a single Mum on a disability pension, living in government housing — he is particularly entitled to feel proud of his many achievements. But the issue here is not what Albanese is entitled to do. It’s that he seemed to have temporarily forgotten that prime ministers are subject to more scrutiny than any other member of the parliament — and that the invisible line between what is public and what is private business has all but dissolved in an age when almost everyone has a smart phone in their pocket and can publish instantly across social media platforms.

Yes, being prime minister must be at times a terrible job, and being able to think and plan for the future with the person you love would be a welcome distraction through 20-hour days and interminable flights around the country. But it’s also a privilege. And what is certain is that purchasing that Copacabana, NSW beach house risked a housing campaign at the next election in which Albanese is characterised as ‘Mr Cliff Top Mansion’, much as Malcolm Turnbull morphed into ‘Mr Harbourside Mansion’ back in the 2016 campaign.

And in an election campaign in which cost of living is expected to be the number one issue, with the cost of renting or buying a home perhaps the most important point of policy difference, making a caricature of yourself is perhaps not a smart move. Perhaps Albanese has lost a yard in terms of tactical smarts, as some of his colleagues are starting to wonder. I believe it’s too early to make that call.

What is clear is that Albanese has suffered for being a cautious PM. He has enjoyed too much the long ‘Scott Morrison is no longer PM’ honeymoon before seeing a slow, steady decline in his approval rating and Labor’s primary vote, and now he needs to do something to revive his government’s flagging fortunes.

He is not alone in this caution.

In the United States and the United Kingdom, the major parties of the centre left are led by people who share these cautious characteristics. Labor, the Democrats and Labour share a belief in the urgent need to tackle climate change, a belief in freer trade and open markets, and a concern at the decline in trust in the institutions that have buttressed and underpinned the liberal democracies — political parties, courts, major companies such as banks and supermarkets, the public education and health systems and even the media. 

 

'Albanese must embrace risk, as John Howard did in the 1998 GST election, and do so in a way that reminds people what he stands for. Jim Chalmers has his Treasury department working on options relating to negative gearing and capital gains tax reforms.'

 

And Albanese, Kamala Harris and Keir Starmer are all personally cautious, too. All three are engaged in the politics of avoiding hard things and voters are marking them down for it, if the polls in Australia, Starmer’s first 100 days and Donald Trump’s slight lead over Harris are any guide.

Which brings us back to the issue of a potential Albanese minority government after the next poll. Albanese came to power with a plan for a long-term Labor government that, importantly, would reclaim key ‘trust’ equities from the Coalition including who is better at managing the economy and who is managing the defence of Australia. By being cautious, by hurrying (slowly) to reform, by handing down consecutive surpluses and fully committing to the AUKUS nuclear deal, Albanese believed this was possible — and initially Labor took the lead on these and just about every other measure. But in the wake of the Voice to parliament referendum defeat, the High Court’s NZYQ decision on indefinite detention, numerous own goals including the census questions debacle and the leak on possible negative gearing changes, and the horror of Hamas’ actions on 7 October 2023 — and the Israeli response, which has roiled domestic politics for a year — those key equities have dissipated.

Yes, plenty of Australians have question marks in mind when they think of Peter Dutton as prime minister. But Labor is not going to arrest the slow decline in its support by avoiding hard things and shrinking further in on itself. The government’s strongest decision this term has been to alter the stage 3 tax cuts to make them more equitable.

Albanese must embrace risk, as John Howard did in the 1998 GST election, and do so in a way that reminds people what he stands for. Jim Chalmers has his Treasury department working on options relating to negative gearing and capital gains tax reforms. There are other policy options that could be pursued, too.

What it comes down to is this: long after he has left politics and he’s sitting on his back deck on the NSW Central Coast, how does Anthony Albanese want to be remembered? As a bold leader, or a cautious incrementalist?

 

 


James Massola is National Affairs editor for The Age and the Sydney Morning Herald, based in Canberra. He has previously been South-East Asia Correspondent, based in Jakarta, and Chief Political Correspondent in Canberra. He has also worked for the Canberra Times, the Australian, the Australian Financial Review, as assistant editor of Eureka Street and is a regular commentator on ABC radio and TV. He is also the author ofThe Great Cave Rescue about the Thai boys football team.

Main image: Anthony Albanese (Getty Images).

Topic tags: James Massola, Albanese, Prime Minister, Housing, Australia, AusPol2024

 

 

submit a comment

Existing comments

Albanese’ s government has been neither cautious nor thoughtful. It has just been plain cowardly


Peter stokes | 24 October 2024  

The Albanese Government's failure to lift the "Jobseeker" rate out of the poverty level is an own goal for the ALP. Its failure to reverse some of the worst decisions of the Howard government is going to came back and bite it, just as it did to the ALP government of 2007-13 did. I would have thought that Albanese would have learnt some lessons from the time of Rudd and Gillard. Instead, with some relatively obscure exceptions, too much of the socially damaging changes made by the Howard Government remain untouched (e.g., privatisation of aged care). Even worse was forcing Fatima Payman out of the ALP because she supported a Greens motion recognising Palestinian statehood. It made the ALP look like it was still stuck in a 1950s mindset: the "my Party right or wrong' tribal mindset. If the Party is wrong, say so, it might just save it.


Bruce Stafford | 24 October 2024  

The Prime Minister is an old party strategist. He could probably achieve more with a hung parliament. We need radical decisions and the Canberra system only allows them under certain circumstances.


Lawrence Roberts | 24 October 2024  

Contrary to reports, the Albanese administration has been a successful reformist government. It has restored trade alliances which its predecessors trashed. Record exports have funded tax cuts, balanced the budget and cut net debt.

Household wealth is up 23.7% on three years ago. Workers now get 52.6% of the national income pie. It has reduced JobSeeker claimants to 5.2% of the labour force, the lowest on record. Calls to the National Debt Hotline for emergency assistance are steadily declining. 

Of course, some families are still struggling, as is true always. But the proportion of citizens in poverty is now lower than at any time in history.

For more than a year Australia has been the only country in the world with top credit ratings, inflation below four per cent and positive economic growth every quarter last year. The latest UBS global wealth figures show Australia is also the only economy to have delivered consecutive surpluses and maintained average wealth per person above US$540,000.

Tragically for Australians, the newsrooms seldom report these outcomes. They focus instead on irrelevancies such as one MP buying one house. Disappointing to see Eureka Street do the same.


Alan Austin | 25 October 2024  

James Massola's article expresses the disappointment so many of us feeling in Albo’s Labor Government. Would like Massola to have included the ‘other policy options’ Albo should be braver on.


Suzanne Marks | 25 October 2024  

Yet another blatant anti-Labor diatribe. A person whether they are head of a Government or not has the right to purchase a home.
The Greens have been at the core of many of Labor’s problems. Continually blocking legislation that would allow for the Government to raise taxes on the wealthy and other corporations who have been allowed to get away with not paying taxes and pulling their weight in order to bolster the economy. Furthermore, a thinly veiled Trump endorsement was not lost on this reader.


Jennifer Carr | 27 October 2024  

What a tragic shame that some people in the media allow their personal biases to erode the truth. This government (for whom I did not vote) have achieved more for Australia and its people in the face of serious world wide events than four successive governments (for whom I foolishly voted) caste in the mould of Howard, the disastrous Abbott/Credlin duopoly, the Trumpian Morrison and now the negatively pathetic Dutton. God help us!!


John Frawley | 31 October 2024  

It seems to me, at the danger of going against the zeitgist of this commentary section, that this Labour government has been pretty disastrous for the common good in our land. Genuflecting differentially to the unions in radical IR reforms and large pay rises with no workplace quid pro quo reform, has gone in the opposite direction to improving our awful levels of productivity which is the only way to improve longer term financial well being. Their spending, especially on all sorts of handouts, on a hopelessly expensive ideology of unachievable "net zero" in a short time scale, has increased inflation un-necessarily and pumped up interest rates which are both active ingredients of poverty.


Haydn Walters | 02 November 2024  

Similar Articles

Demonic youths and sacred children

  • Binoy Kampmark
  • 31 October 2024

Two narratives dominate Australia’s view of children. The first casts them as dangerous, irredeemable offenders. The second, as vulnerable innocents threatened by risks online. Both anxieties reveal deep-seated tensions over safety, innocence, and societal responsibility.

READ MORE

The gates to the secret house of death

  • Andrew Hamilton
  • 30 October 2024

  The traditions of All Saints Day and All Souls Day invite a rare reflection on death — a topic largely sidelined in contemporary Australia. Amid global events and various cultural spectacles, these days offer a quiet reminder to consider how we honour the dead and what that reveals about our values.

READ MORE
Join the conversation. Sign up for our free weekly newsletter  Subscribe