Want to live to be 100?

12 June 2006

Do you want to live to 100? Given the cult of youth in advertising, soaring rates of elective plastic surgery and the abiding myths of the Fountain of Youth, vampires and Faust, it’s probably safe to assume that many people would say yes, almost without thinking. After all, we seem to be programmed to fight for our lives, whether it’s because of a genuine lust for life or fear of dying. On reflection, most people interested in accepting the offer of living longer would probably stipulate they wanted to be sure they had a decent quality of life—to be fit, healthy, strong and in possession of their faculties—but given that…why not? In the developed world, it’s becoming increasingly possible. In the past century, for instance, average lifespan in places like Western Europe, the US, Canada, Australia, NZ and Japan, has increased from about 55 to about 80. This trend shows no sign of slowing down, and it is now based on a lot more than better healthcare and diet. As researchers learn more and more about how organisms work, it’s becoming increasingly evident that our lifespan is programmed into us and can be reprogrammed. An astonishing range of creatures, for instance, including mammals such as mice, can lengthen their lives significantly by eating less than they normally would, but enough to stay healthy. And there’s no reason to think that humans would be any different. While no guaranteed elixir of life is available yet, there are possibilities on the horizon. Geneticists have already discovered genes in many animals, including mice, that regulate lifespan. And again, there’s no reason to think that humans would be exempt. So… Do you want to live to 100? It’s actually a question we should be facing seriously. If you knew that you were going to live to 100, for instance, would you organise your life in the same way? Would you retire at 60? What about your finances and superannuation? Would it change your relationship with your immediate family? How about medical care? It’s now possible with corrective surgery to have better eyesight than that with which you were born. It may soon become possible to replace, correct or maintain lots of other parts of your body. How should such intervention be regulated? Will this lead to elderly have and have nots? How much should the public health system pay for? If you have the

ENVIRONMENT

Want to live to be 100?

Subscriber login