A- A A+

We treat dogs better than the asylum seekers

10 Comments
 |  22 August 2017

 

Last week I was rung to say my dog was missing. I finished at work as soon as I could, ringing the local council and neighbourhood vet on the way home. Neither had seen anything of him but suggested we post on social media. As my husband and I drove and walked the streets, the messages came in. People were concerned. He was missing from an enclosed yard. Some offered to look, others from further away, shared hope and the Facebook post. The post went everywhere, the last I saw was in Western Australia.

ABC officeMid-afternoon, the Vet called. The person who brought him in didn’t leave their name. He was brought from his warm cosy area of safe-keeping towards us. I was ecstatic. He was unperturbed. At the beginning of this year, my 31-year old son moved interstate. Despite the fact he has lived independently from me for 14 years, I still had the yearning to see him safe in his new abode. When he was five years old, I would sometimes hide behind the bushes staring into the school yard hoping that he’d found a friend. I suppose that is what I still hope for him, the kind of friend he could drop in on in the bad times and drop in on in the good.

During the same week, on Manus Island, another mother’s 31-year-old son went missing. He was a man known to have been living with trauma, who had been recommended to have medical attention. His own friends had posted messages to alert Australians to his desperation.

In the last four years, my son became engaged and married. Together he and his wife took on the adventure of moving interstate to new jobs, creating their home and now they’re spending time in Europe. Some of his photos and posts from these years depict a young man working hard, providing enjoyment and leadership. Others depict a young man mad for the girl he has married, at ease in his own skin and having a hell of a good time.

In the last four years, Hamed Shamshiripour had been detained in the prison of the Australian detention system. He was denied the care he needed. A week ago he died.

I think of what he and the other young men imprisoned in off-shore detention centres could have been contributing to our country. I think of what they could have created in their own families and their new communities. But it is not just the waste of these years, it is the awfulness to which these men have been subjected.

I listened to Hamed’s father describing his healthy, adventurous son as he had known him prior to detention. Few things speak so poignantly of the waste of these four years for the men on Manus. I watched the Al Jazeera news with images of the detention centre beaming around the world. I remember when I felt so proud to be Australian. In this system, I feel deep shame.

I am considering how people might have reacted when my dog was taken to the vet clinic if he were denied the treatment he needed, if he were beaten and tormented and kept in isolation from our family for four years. He wasn’t. People joined in the search, the concern was palpable. Once found, he was welcomed and kept safe and reunited with us as soon as possible.

 

"Hamed Shamshiripour had been detained in the prison of the Australian detention system. He was denied the care he needed. A week ago he died."

 

If only the same level of concern and care had been shown to Hamed Shamshiripour. A week has gone by; people continue to check how my dog is. I wonder who is checking on the young men on Manus? Hamed’s death has shifted a long way from front page news.

As I read the reports and watched the detention centre footage being beamed around the world, I felt embarrassed, a deep-rooted humiliation, what kind of an Australia are we projecting to the world?

Now I check the news fearfully. Grief and anger and fear of the unknown are a volatile combination. I am looking at the images of children and parents, and desperate young men. I am shocked by the violence of the people in security. I learn that a man has been put in jail for having a camera; another has been moved for medical reasons.

I am watching young teenagers and children who are entitled to be in school, entitled to a childhood. My questions are shifting. I am wanting to know the same answer to the question so many ask of other crimes against humanity, how could this be allowed to happen? How could it continue? But as more days go by, the question I now ask of my country is, what kind of an Australia are we choosing to be?

 

 

 


Rohan SalmondPoet, Essayist and Funeral Director, Anne Gleeson lives in Terang in the South-West of Victoria. Her third poetry collection Small Acts of Purpose will be released in November.

 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

The question every person with a modicum of humanity asks Rohan - What kind of nation are we that this barbarity continues?

Rod Horsfield 23 August 2017

Treating both asylum seekers and dogs as we would wish to be treated is what's needed. It's not the fault of appropriately cared about animals. Compassion is not a limited substance that needs to be dispensed to the supposedly more deserving - it's something that is actually expansive in nature and scope.

THOMAS RYAN 23 August 2017

Hi Thomas - I agree with you in principle, but I also see the point of Anne Gleeson's article that there are blaring and disturbing examples when we DON'T treat our vulnerable human beings as well as we would treat a lost pet. What we should do and what's evident on a social scale creates a wake-up call for me. I don't criticise people who advocate for animal rights, but I do challenge them and remind them of the realities.

AURELIUS 23 August 2017

Thank you, Anne, for expressing so well the anger, anguish and shame so many of us feel at the cruelty of our Government in regard to asylum seekers not only on Manus Is and Nauru but in places like Yongah Hill in WA. Hopefully, what you have written will help someone to reflect on what Australia has now become in its unjust treatment of innocent people

Geoff Seaman 23 August 2017

The statistics for numbers of healthy unwanted dogs euthanased as well as cases of cruelty and neglect makes me think we don't care much about either. Perhaps until there is a personal connection, or as Thomas alludes to, compassionate people care about both.

Janelle 23 August 2017

Excellent piece, Anne, and a telling comparison. Sadly, it is comparatively easy for "the public" i.e. us, to look for a lost dog and get it home to its family; brutally frustrating for us demanding closure of all the detention centres, especially those off-shore on Manus Is and Nauru, where our Parliament (both sides of the House) continues to shirk its responsibility towards the detainees.

Ian Fraser 24 August 2017

It is indeed a terrible indictment of Australian priorities when household pets are deemed more worthy of care than the human beings Australia has imprisoned offshore. Australia will bear this ignominy forever. Thank you for expressing the outrage and sorrow so many Australians. Nothing will change until we can convince our political masters that unless policies change, they'll lose their jobs.

Juliet 24 August 2017

Human beings are made in the image and likeness of the divine.

Dr.Cajetan Coelho 25 August 2017

Anee this is so sad and so lovely, and all the more pertinent because I was following your missing dog updates on Facebook. It makes me ashamed of aaustralia too.

robyn 29 August 2017

Great article. I have come to believe that the way we treat the animals of the word has become reflected in the way we treat other human beings. Animals,whether they be domesticated or wild are often treated with less respect than they deserve. Largely, I think because they are not us. Commonly asylum seekers are seen in the same light. Different, not us. This article fills me with hope that not everyone thinks this way

geoff 29 August 2017

Similar articles

Why having a female Dr Who matters

12 Comments
Neve Mahoney | 27 July 2017

xxxxxIt was recently announced that the thirteenth iteration of the main character in Doctor Who will be played by Jodie Whittaker. A woman. In 2017, the casting of a white woman in a major TV role is hardly revolutionary, except that the role is the Doctor, a regenerative alien who can take on the appearance of anyone, but has for 12 iterations tended towards the persona of a quirky British white man.


Encryption and liberties on the 'ungovernable' internet

6 Comments
Binoy Kampmark | 14 July 2017

WhatsApp and Facebook iconsTurnbull's attitude echoes the fear all autocracies have: that control is slipping away, and that citizens cannot be trusted to behave in a modern communications environment without government intrusions. Arguments are repeatedly made that such enlarged powers are never abused - a charmingly naive assumption - and that law enforcement authorities merely need the 'capacity' to have them. These can either abate, or be extended, after a review. The reality tends to be different.


Stock images strengthen chronic fatigue stigma

4 Comments
Evan Young | 14 July 2017

Silhouette in mistIf used without thought, stock images can misrepresent and trivialise serious issues. I have the displeasure of living with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, a hugely misunderstood and devastating condition. When I see an article on CFS, it is almost always beneath a stock photo of somebody yawning or with head in hands. These images contribute to society's misapprehension that CFS is exclusively related to sleep, making it even tougher for patients to live in a world already hard enough to live in.


Balance vs fairness in giving airtime to conspiracy theorists

4 Comments
Francine Crimmins | 19 June 2017

Alex JonesThe NBC has pushed ahead with its plans to air Megyn Kelly's interview with conspiracy theorist Alex Jones despite criticism from friends and family whose loved ones were killed in the Sandy Hook massacre, which Jones claims was 'staged by actors' and 'never happened'. This contentious interview has sparked a conversation about which forums should allow dissenting viewpoints and whether dangerous ideas should be given public airtime in a news context.


Shielding kids from Grenfell Tower televised trauma

3 Comments
Barry Gittins | 16 June 2017

Grenfell Tower aflameAn article focusing on the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings reported that people 'exposed to more than six hours of daily media coverage of the tragedy were more likely to experience symptoms of acute stress than those directly affected by the event'. News junkies, or those who saw extended coverage, were found to be worse off than those who actually survived the bombings. This is sobering as we consider how we deal with our children's exposure to traumatic events playing out on TV news.