A- A A+

AFL must take a serious stand against sexist sledging

7 Comments
Paul Mitchell |  17 May 2017

 

I was 16 and playing senior football for my local team the first time I doubted whether it was the sport for me. At training, the men's talk turned to the various ways they liked to 'take' their wives. They spoke as if the women in their lives were of a different species.

Marc MurphyI looked at my friend, also a teenager in this man's world. We were stunned. We had girlfriends and had never spoken to each other about them in this way.

That was in 1984. The abuse of Marc Murphy's wife in the Carlton vs St Kilda match last Saturday shows not much has changed.

Regardless of the AFL Women's competition, female umpires, women in administrative roles — even CEOs at Hawthorn — the problem of sexism in football isn't going away without legislation to stop it.

The reason is that in a hyper-masculine and highly competitive environment like the AFL, femininity, personified in women, is seen as weakness. And any weakness will be exploited in order for clubs to achieve their ultimate aim: to win.

It's similar to the way in which clubs play 'on the edge' of the rules; they try not to cross them because it will involve penalties that will affect their ability to win. Laws against taunts that are motivated by race, religion or sexual preference have been instituted and have proven successful, and there's no reason why one against sexist talk can't succeed.

There has been a lot of blather over the past few days in regard to whether legislating against sexist slurs is political correctness gone mad, as well as players knowing where the line is in terms of 'banter' and being usually good at not crossing it. Others say it will be impossible to delineate what is sexist abuse and what isn't.

I say all three arguments are baseless. It's not political correctness to ensure people aren't slandered because of their gender. Players clearly don't know where the line is, otherwise Saturday's events wouldn't have unfolded. And a starting point delineation line is easy: if sledging involves disparaging a player's female family or friends then it is wrong and will be penalised.

 

"Real men play the ball, not the man or woman."

 

Some might argue that the new law should include disparaging remarks toward a player that focus on gender, i.e. 'you're a girl', 'you're a woman', etc. But I'm not sure it needs to. Because a man worth anything in this period when patriarchal society is being called powerfully into question won't take that as a sledge. They'll take it as a compliment.

If I was compared to the women in my life — my strong mum, my wise wife and my emotionally mature daughter — I'd think I was well on the way to being a man whose masculinity and femininity are integrated. These are the men our society needs and they are the men we need playing AFL football. Because real men play the ball, not the man or woman.

 


Paul Mitchell headshotPaul Mitchell is a Melbourne writer. His novel We. Are. Family. will be out via MidnightSun Publishing this year.

 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

Great article Mitch. Not much hope though when the US President talks and behaves in exactly this sexist manner.

Ky 19 May 2017

Fantastic & important article Paul: it should be mandatory reading for EVERYONE involved in the AFL, no matter what their level. With thanks, Christine

Christine Judith Nicholls 19 May 2017

We don't need more laws, Paul. All that needs to be done is to kick the offender out of the club and dock the Club CEO's salary by a few thousand bucks and that would sort it out in one hit.

john frawley 19 May 2017

Having arrived on these shores over 50 years ago with my parents I never took to Aussie Rules despite going to two great footy playing schools. Fortunately I could play Rugby. I remember the late, witty Keith Dunstan and his 'Anti-Football League'. Despite having started with a match between Scotch and my alma mater and a few real gentlemen, like the Cordners; the late great Ted Whitten and Ron Barassi, having played, AFL exudes an atmosphere of yobbery, rife with racial vilification and general bad behaviour amongst its followers. It's not just misogynist. That would be bad enough. It's worse.

Edward Fido 19 May 2017

A good article! However, I do not think that legislation is the answer to respecting women. In Australia and most other countries; women are not treated equally. Most men, including upper middle class and working class men are anti-feminist and misogynist. Most Australian men have a poor knowledge of feminist philosophy, especially classic books such as Simone De Beauvoir's 'The Second Sex' and Germaine Greer's 'The Female Eunuch'. Most footballers from all codes and competitions are only interested in women as sexual partners. Most of these men are also racial and religious bigots and have little respect for indigenous people and culture and homosexual people and members of the Islam religion.

Mark Doyle 20 May 2017

Re Mark Doyle's comments: with respect I suggest most Australian men are not misogynists but I think that there are some very nasty chauvinists out there and they are encouraged by what passes for a 'blokey, matey atmosphere' in various places, such as footy clubs. It's very much the same sort of atmosphere you would find among similar groups in the UK or USA, such as soccer hooligans or 'Archie Bunker' types. I agree that legislation is not 'the answer' although I do need to point out there is already appropriate legislation against sexual harassment and violence of all sorts which people are sometimes loath to put into practice. It needs to be. That is something all young boys and girls need to be taught. I think the best place for that is in the family and by example. I am vastly encouraged by the sort of atmosphere which exists in the Scandinavian countries where they have a far healthier attitude towards women and are much more truly egalitarian in this regard than we are. We can learn much from them. I don't think we are 'hopeless' here but I think we could be marked 'needs improvement'.

Edward Fido 22 May 2017

For better or worse, sledging is part of the sporting life. Nothing will stop it. I copped it playing footy and cricket as a kid and soon realised my best response was to ignore it simply because I was no good at it. I would always think of a great response 18 hours later. Flippancy aside, sledging only works if it gets under the skin of the opposition. That's why they do it. It's easy to say "don't let it get to you" but much harder to do when you are the target. I doubt it can be regulated out of sport. That would be asking too much and impossible to police. A good rule of thumb came from a TV sports journalist on the weekend. If you can't say it on the street, you can't say it on the sports field. That rules out vilification on racial or sexual orientation grounds and anything else that is illegal but still leaves a wide opening. Maybe we need to start with kids and teach them respect for their opponents and also for the referee/umpire/officials. Parents on the sidelines should set a high standard as well so as people grow up sledging becomes the exception. On the other hand, the behaviour of our political "leaders" in Question Time makes me wonder if sledging on the sporting field is such a big problem after all.

Brett 22 May 2017

Similar articles

Bad sports and politics

4 Comments
John Warhurst | 26 April 2017

John CoatesRecent adverse coverage of sporting organisations has revealed once again what looks like widespread organisational dysfunction. Sport is such a major part of Australian life that we should all be interested in what goes on within the multi-million dollar organisations that run it, whether it be the big football codes, cricket, tennis or the Olympic sports. The stakes are huge and the issues, including self-interest, interstate rivalries and personality conflicts are eerily familiar in public life more generally.


Youth justice system needs reform not repression

7 Comments
Andrew Hamilton | 26 April 2017

Hand print on wallWe need only to imagine ourselves as a child subject to the practices described in these accounts, to find them scarifying. The recurring images of children lying in the foetal position, in solitary confinement, hooded or surrounded by guards say it all. When we set them against the results of research into the biological and psychological development of children, detention, prolonged lockdowns, isolation and a culture of punishment are destructive and counterproductive.


Take care not to co-opt soldiers' and civilians' deaths

4 Comments
Andrew Hamilton | 21 April 2017

Anzac Day Dawn Service at Kings Park, Western AustraliaAt Anzac Day it is common to set the deaths of soldiers into the context of a larger cause; as shaping a template of national identity. This year we celebrate it in a sea of citizen deaths from terrorism and military actions. Such killings are also often set within a broader context such as democracy, national security, or the Western way of life. Deeper reflection suggests that to attribute meaning and value to people through their relationship to a cause does not enhance but diminishes their humanity.


It is my duty to remember

16 Comments
Gillian Bouras | 21 April 2017

Spirits of soldiers watch as children pay tribute to their memory. Cartoon by Chris JohnstonEvery Anzac Day there seem to be arguments about the legitimacy of what has been called the One Day of the Year. In the past I have taken my turn at rebutting views that express the belief that such days are part of a wholly reprehensible glorification of war. I've had a great deal of time to think about the matter, and also have a personal involvement: my grandfather and father were in the Australian Army, and both saw active service, about which periods they hardly ever spoke.


Breaking down the 457 visa changes

3 Comments
Kerry Murphy | 20 April 2017

457 visa formsThere are several significant changes which mean that for a number of occupations, the pathway to a permanent visa sponsored by an employer will be closed. A number of people will only be able to get a temporary work visa for two years, and a further two year period after that only. It is the latest in a range of changes to immigration that have seen Australia change from being a country of permanent migration, to one of permanent and temporary migration.