A- A A+

US is no stranger to electoral meddling

4 Comments
Binoy Kampmark |  09 March 2017

 

Each day is met by the same reports: electoral interference has supposedly taken place, instigated by Russian, or at the very least outsourced Russian entities, in the elections of Europe and the United States. Such claims assert, not merely the reality of these claims, but the nature of their influence.

Trump manipulates puppet strings while he is manipulated with strings from Russia and China. Cartoon by Chris JohnstonSuch a stance detracts from one fundamental point: that the manipulation of electoral systems has been, and remains, common fare, irrespective of the finger pointing at Moscow. The shock has been towards the modern nature of that interference, capitalising on hacking as a key feature.

The United States, where claims of Russian influence remain the most notable and jagged, has not only been a key instigator of electoral disruption in other countries, even to the point of overthrowing elected governments, but a previous recipient of that fact.

On the latter point, Britain can stake an important claim to pioneering the copybook of local electoral interference, a strategy it undertook with some dedication in 1940.

In 1999, a history commissioned by Canadian Sir William Stephenson, chief of British Security Coordination responsible for Secret Intelligence Services operations in North and South America (1941-5), was declassified.

The history shed light on the committed efforts of Prime Minister Winston Churchill's government to create a formidable apparatus of propaganda and influence within the United States, designed to sway the opinions of Americans against neutrality in favour of the British war effort.

Tactics to that end involved the illegal interception of enemy communications on US soil, the infiltration of unfriendly labour unions and the funnelling of radio and print propaganda sympathetic to Britain's plight through networks in the United States.

According to Steve Usdin there were 'perhaps hundreds of Americans who believed that fighting fascism justified unethical and, at times, illegal behaviour'. Usdin provides a reminder that Britain's Secret Intelligence Services were adept at using their own variant of fake news and smear campaigns against candidates sympathetic to the 'America First' line.

 

"Global powers with the means and capability to alter the so-called trajectory of history through electoral interference, tend to do so."

 

In 1996, the US election system again became the subject of alleged external tinkering, this time in the form of campaign finance from Chinese sources to the Democratic Party. As with what took place in 2016, there was rage and indignation. Some members of Congress went so far as to call for punitive action against the PRC. The Clinton administration was unconvinced. 'We have received the relevant briefings,' noted White House press secretary Michael McCurry. 'We believe there's no basis for any change in our policy towards China, which is one of engagement.'

When interviewed by the New York Times on the subject, Peter Kornbluh of the National Security Archive, an affiliate of George Washington University, turned the tables on the critics of Beijing's alleged involvement. 'China has done little more,' he suggested, 'than emulate a long pattern of US manipulation, bribery and covert operations to influence the political trajectory of countless countries around the world.'

Such an influence of the political trajectory, the argot of interference in the political mechanisms of other states, has been at the forefront of US foreign policy for decades. In a mild variant, it finds form in the financial ventures of the 'civil society' projects of the National Endowment of Democracy, channelling funds to dissident groups.

Then come instances of more overt uses of force and sabotage in the Middle East, Latin America and Africa, often with disastrous consequences to the local populace. More often than not, this entailed the direct overthrow of populist leaders, often democratically elected. In 1953, Iran got a hefty taste of Anglo-American interference that ultimately saw Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh overthrown in 1953. The Pahlavi dynasty proved the greatest beneficiary. In 1961, the removal and murder of Congolese leader Patrice Lumumba set the stage for a reign of looting and terror in the guise of a Washington-friendly Mobutu Sese Seko.

Even as Russia is accused of meddling in the current French presidential campaign, the CIA has been found, via documents released on WikiLeaks, to have been involved in conducting espionage orders in the lead-up to the 2012 election. These documents, available from the CIA Vault 7 Series, reveal efforts to infiltrate all major French political parties using human (HUMINT) and electronic (SIGINT) spies seven months leading up to the presidential election.

Orders included obtaining the 'Strategic Election Plans' of the Union for Popular Movement Party, and a set of questions for analysts. Note was made of 'Sarkozy's level of confidence in his ability to contest the election, and how he and his advisors interact'.

None of these instances of history ever justifies sovereign breaches by one state into the affairs of another. But the privileging of a single power as being singularly nefarious, unique in effect and influence, is misplaced. Global powers with the means and capability to alter the so-called trajectory of history through electoral interference, tend to do so. A more salient point is how resilient the targeted country is, and the actual effect such interventions have.

 


Binoy KampmarkDr Binoy Kampmark is a former Commonwealth Scholar who lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne.

Cartoon by Chris Johnston

 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

I agree with Binoy, there is a very high level of hypocritical nonsense in the allegations coming out of the US about interference in the recent US Presidential election. There is NO doubt in my mind that the CIA was involved in the conspiracy that brought down the Whitlam Government in 1975. There is ample evidence that the US was alarmed when Whitlam won in 1972 that we might withdraw from the Alliance or close down Pine Gap and other US spy networks in Australia . Their record in Central and South America was terrible. The CIA behaviour during the Vietnam War was despicable !

Gavin 14 March 2017

Binoy, you nailed it.

David Healy 14 March 2017

Interesting article, and no surprise. Britain has a dark history of propaganda; the distorted coverage of the 1916 rising given to the US press as an example; and Churchill "set up" the sinking of the Lusitania, the most obscene PR event in history. It got him what he was after, none the less.

paul 14 March 2017

Dear Binoy, your article makes some good points but it suffers from a classic basic flaw of a false moral equivalence. Winston Churchill was trying to draw the USA into the most important moral crusade of the last 1000 years, against the freakish evil of Hitlarite fascism. The USA was at the times you quote fighting the similar evil of Soviet totalitarianism, even if in retrospect some of their targets were off beam. In general the USA and the UK were on the side of the angels. On the other hand, Putin`s vicious, murderous, kleptocracy regime certainly is not, and what we have seen is a frontal attack on one of the best systems of governance even devised.

Eugene 14 March 2017

Similar articles

There's life in Ecuador's 21st century socialism

4 Comments
Antonio Castillo | 02 March 2017

Lenin MorenoEcuadoreans will head back to the polls on 2 April after this month's presidential election didn't come up with an outright winner. Against all projections Socialist Lenin Moreno, who served as Rafael Correa's vice president from 2007 to 2013, did very well. While he fell short of winning, there is a sense that the Ecuadorean 21st century socialism, an economic and political model instigated by Correa, is still popular; and in this Andean country of 15 million the majority are poor.


Cultural memory points the way through the Trumpocalypse

6 Comments
Brigitte Dwyer | 24 February 2017

The Tetrapylon, one of the most famous monuments in the ancient city of Palmyra, before it was destroyed by Islamic State group militants.To many in the West, we are living in a time of despair, an era of nihilism and meaninglessness, signified by growing violence, environment degradation and, most importantly, political chaos. This combination of events, and the sense of hopelessness that accompanies them, can easily be seen as markers of doom, a sign that the era of Western culture is in terminal decline. But it's also possible to interpret them as indicators of the malaise that marks the very peak of life.


Food waste in the age of hunger

2 Comments
Francine Crimmins | 24 February 2017

Sudanese childThis week the UN announced that more than 20 million people across four African countries face starvation in the coming months. As the World Food Program struggles to feed the starving, they are also reminding people that where there is great need in the world, there is often great waste. In Australia, the Department of Environment and Energy estimates food waste is costing households $8 billion every year. This is twice what the UN predicts it needs to cease a famine in four nations.


Scorsese misses the depths of the 'Japanese swamp'

7 Comments
Jeremy Clarke | 22 February 2017

Andrew Garfield and Japanese actor in SilenceWe are treated at length to Rodrigues' reflections upon the face of Christ, yet the beautiful inculturated image 'Madonna of the Snows' passes us quickly by. There are haunting local hymns yet the missionaries speak halting Japanese. The local church is served by a respected un-ordained head, who leads his fellow villagers in prayer and good works. The survival of the Japanese Catholic community rested on the feeble, faith-filled shoulders of the local women and men who kept praying even unto death.


Swedish politicians' veiled let-down of Iranian feminists

4 Comments
Azadeh Davachi | 16 February 2017

Swedish Trade Minister Ann Linde in the hijabSweden's feminist Trade Minister Ann Linde has come under sharp criticism from some Iranian women's rights activists after she and her female colleagues wore hijab and long coats in their meetings with the Iranian president and other delegations in Tehran. Later Linde maintained she did not want to violate the law in Iran where it has been mandatory for women to wear headdress since 1979. This flies in the face of the Swedish government's position on women's rights.