A- A A+

Ian Paisley's no middle ground

Frank O'Shea |  21 September 2014

I think of that brave man Paisley, eyeless
In Gaza, with a daisy chain of millstones
Round his neck; groping, like blind Samson,
For the soapy pillars and greased poles of lightning
To pull them down in rains and borborygmic roars
Of rhetoric. (There but for the grace of God,
Goes God.) 

W R Rodgers Home Thoughts from Abroad

Ian Paisley and Martin McGuinnessThose lines come from the mid-60s, years before the world heard of the demagogue preacher with a speciality in rooting out Babylonian whores hiding under Roman cassocks. In 1988, he was forcibly ejected from the European Parliament for shouting at Pope John Paul II 'I denounce you as the Antichrist.' Fiercely loyal, in his idiosyncratic way, to the empire and the monarch – he was after all a member of her Privy Council – he made a career out of biblical scorn for the unrighteous, deep loathing of sodomy and a good head for business.  

And then, in his eighties, ten years past the biblical appointed age, the old firebrand began to mellow. In 2006 he went to meet the Archbishop of Armagh, the Pope’s main man in Ireland, and they sat down to tea together. The following year, he almost took Irish Taoiseach Bertie Ahern’s arm from its socket with a ferocious handshake. That was the year he began a career as First Minister of Northern Ireland, running the statelet with Martin McGuinness as his deputy, a man he cordially hated. 

But somehow, Paisley and McGuinness worked well together. The Chuckle Brothers they were called, an attempt to present them as two buffoons out of their depth, but for ordinary people, it was an endearing image, a tribute to a pair who had brought their respective sides with them in an unlikely peace. There were elements in Unionism who viewed Paisley as a traitor, just as there were nationalists who were appalled that Sinn Fein appeared to have shelved their aspiration for Irish unity and gave support to the strongly Protestant police force. Those elements still exist.

It would be easy to be scornful of Paisley’s late-life conversion to democracy, a way of thinking he showed little respect for in the past. But then, Sinn Fein, the political party with whom he found himself running his little polity, had no great track record in that regard either. 

However, at least in Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness, Sinn Fein had two men of extraordinary perseverance and courage. They managed to turn what was essentially a single issue group with a tendency to view success in terms of the amount of mayhem they could cause, into a genuine political party with widespread community support. And since coming into the blustery Stormont tent, Sinn Fein ministers have earned a reputation as highly competent, hardworking and cooperative.  

The Ulster experiment is a unique form of democracy. Normally, when people or policies are in dispute, some middle ground is sought, some agreement with which all sides can work. What began seven years ago in Belfast was quite different: Sinn Fein still wanted a united Ireland; the Unionists were determined to remain part of Great Britain. There was and still is no middle ground: instead there was an agreement to work together within tightly specified guidelines for the greater good of a community that had suffered too much.

One of the dangers to the success of the venture was any kind of looking back. Gerry Adams still says he was never a member of the Provisional IRA, but few believe him; as a young man, Martin McGuinness was the IRA leader in Derry. Ian Paisley had to swallow all the words he used when swearing that he would never sup with such devils, just as nationalists had to forget the B-Specials and Burntollet and Bloody Sunday and every humiliation they suffered for more than half a century. 

And there were people on both sides who had to endure seeing those responsible for the death or maiming of a member of their family, walking the streets - perhaps even in the employ of the government. 

We are told that his former allies and henchmen deserted Paisley, that he died a lonely man. After learning of his death, McGuinness left a Sinn Fein Congress to speak of him as a friend. 

For much of his career, Ian Paisley held Christianity up to ridicule. It would be nice to think that in his final years the clergyman half of him paid greater heed to the exhortations of the Jewish rabbi who preached peace and forgiveness two thousand years ago. Vicisti, Galilæe.

Frank O'Shea headshotFrank O'Shea is a retired Canberra school teacher.

Ian Paisley and Martin McGuinness image by Albert Gonzalez Farran/Flickr Creative Commons



Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

I read Ian Paisley's obituary with interest and in a sombre way in the SMH earlier in the week and now Frank's fine piece of writing. Paisley was an interesting character - it was all or nothing for him and he did have a turn of phrase to make people sit up and take notice. I doubt there would have been much snoozing during his sermons. His passion for his country was obvious, and his late-life conversion to a more circumspect mode of operation showed a lot of strength (and humility).

Pam 19 September 2014

Interesting, the first interview with the Almighty we have will be a personal one. A private audience with the God who knows all. Most of us will be reliant more on His Mercy rather than His Wrath. The harsh Ulster Protestantism of Ian Paisley may prove untrue and he may be admitted to that Heavenly Kingdom through Mercy, not Election, as Classic Calvinists believe. A Divine Irony. Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness may also find the same Mercy. There are many in the British Armed Forces and the Security Services who were very, very dodgy and might, in an ideal world be brought before some sort of international tribunal for their actions. That appears unlikely. The fact that good is coming out of Northern Ireland testifies to the fact that there is something good in human nature which the Almighty can co-opt to achieve His Plans.

Edward Fido 20 September 2014

It is extremely difficult to say anything positive about Paisley. His bigotry was far from admirable Christianity. His rantings led to the loss of many lives.

Peter LEE 21 September 2014

Paisley always wanted to be in the lime-light. He only turned "moderate" when his warriors refused to follow him any more; when they had enough of dying and bleeding for his ego. Adams and McGuinness on the other lead their warriors back to democracy as their representatives, as the end-game of 40 years of struggle again Northern Irish fascism.

Eugene 22 September 2014

I hope that Paisley does not meet the God he believed in !

Martin Donaldson 24 September 2014

Hard to feel sorrow at the demise of a man whose bullying, firebrand rhetoric encouraged such violence and hatred over many decades.

Joan 27 September 2014

Similar articles

Picking on Muslims is getting dull

Ruby Hamad | 12 September 2014

Weekend Australian front cover 'fight Islam 100 years'The readiness with which some westerners take the most violent and extreme groups as legitimate expressions of Islam betrays the racism that underpins perceptions of Muslims. Whether I like it or not, my religious background and my name tie me to these 'jihadists.' I feel the permanent weight of expectation to publicly apologise for their actions.

Not a good time to be Catholic

Kevin Donnelly | 28 August 2014

Girl lighting a candle Growing up in working class Broadmeadows in a Housing Commission estate with a communist father and a Catholic mother – mass on Sunday and the Eureka Youth Movement on Tuesday – taught me first hand about two of the most influential and powerful forces of the 20th century.

Learning from the homeless

Andrew Hamilton | 07 August 2014

Homeless Persons Week PosterContrary to the message of this year's Federal Budget, there is much more to people than their ability to work. When we come to know the disadvantaged well we are often impressed as much by their resilience as by their great need and their fragility. Their worth is not defined by their economic contribution.

An adequate response to child sexual abuse

Andrew Hamilton | 31 July 2014

'Reckoning: the Catholic Church and Child Sexual Abuse' by Chris McGillion and Damian GraceWe might expect that research into the causes and history of sexual abuse will continue and increase. As part of its owning of the crimes that have flourished within it, the challenge for the Church is to take such research seriously, particularly when it touches on the part played by such aspects of Catholic life, culture and governance as clerical celibacy, attitudes to women and sexual morality, and clericalism.

Magnanimous memoir of a 'dead canary' bishop

Andrew Hamilton | 24 July 2014

'Benedict, Me and the Cardinals Three' by Bill MorrisIn mines, where bad air could be lethal, miners used to bring canaries with them. If they fell ill and died, the miners had warning to get out. The recent book by Bishop Bill Morris, replete with documentary evidence, tells the story of a canary caught in the shafts of Vatican culture. His early expiry date pointed to something amiss in the governance of the church, heralding the larger disclosures in the Royal Commission on sexual abuse.