A- A A+

Cruelled by the Budget

4 Comments
John Falzon |  14 May 2014

This Budget is deeply offensive to the people who wage a daily battle to survive.

The government would like us to believe that this Budget is tough but fair, but for the people who struggle to make ends meet it can only be described as being tough but cruel.

There are measures in this Budget that rip the guts out of what remains of a fair and egalitarian Australia. These measures will not help people into jobs but they will force people into poverty.

You don't help young people
or older people
or people with disabilities
or single mums
into jobs
by making them poor.

You don't build people up by putting them down.

And as even the OECD acknowledges, you don't build a strong economy by increasing the level of inequality.

You don't create a strong country on the backs of the already poor.

There's nothing human or humane about humiliating people because they are outside the labour market or on its low-paid fringes.

There's nothing smart about making it unaffordable for people to see a doctor.

This government has walked away from its responsibility to its people.

It has shied away from the challenge to build a broader and more sustainable revenue base so that no one misses out on the essentials of life such as a place to live, a place to work and a place to learn.

We are not in the throes of a fiscal crisis but if we embark on this treacherous path of US-style austerity we will be staring down the barrel of a social crisis.


 

John FalzonDr John Falzon is Chief Executive of the St Vincent de Paul Society National Council and is author of The language of the unheard.

 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

As a devout Catholic who accepts Catholic social teaching, I have my own objections to the budget. It's nowhere near free market enough. And so the poor will continue to be hurt. We need to free up the labour market allow the weakest bargainers to climb onto the first rung of the ladder. Eg, abolish the draconian "Fair Work" regulations which won't allow those school kids in Terang, Vic, to happily and conveniently work 2 hours after school in a newsagency instead of 3, without coercing the boss to pay them at the next level. Give me a break! And so on. The coalition government has missed a great opportunity to radically free up the market and give the poor and vulnerable opportunities to create wealth for themselves. Australia is to a significant extent still not open for business. So much the worse for the poor.

HH 15 May 2014

As a SVP member for the Norwood Conference in S A, I fear that there will be an increase of people needing help to pay their basic Utility charges, J P K

JPKeane 16 May 2014

Sorry HH, but you ignore the clear lessons of history if you think 'Chicago School' trickle-down economics leads to anything else than vastly growing equalities in society. When you have a system and its acolytes with dollar signs for hearts, humans simply become support systems for the economy, rather than being at the centre of our concerns as the gospels tell us they should be. I am a member of vinnies and regularly visit the poor, young and old, in boarding houses in Kings Cross. Try telling them that this is a budget which doesn't go far enough, and that they need to do more heavy lifting. Particularly when many affluent people get off scot free because negative gearing, capital gains tax, trust arrangements for minimizing tax and vastly over- generous superannuation provisions are left untouched. I struggle to find anything vaguely Christian (or Catholic) in any of that. Good on you John for your forthright defence of those in need!

mick mc 16 May 2014

How will people denied the dole afford train fares for job interviews? Seniors get a $2.50 fare in Sydney, but for everyone else train and bus travel are expensive

Lee Andrews 17 May 2014

Similar articles

Labor's light on the hill

7 Comments
Frank Brennan | 02 November 2013

'There have been innumerable post-mortems and words of advice as to how the party with new structures, election rules, and policies can pick itself up, dust off, and win the next election. Sadly some of those post-mortems have come with more coatings of spite and loathing. It is no part of my role in the public square as a Catholic priest to offer such advice.' Frank Brennan's address to the Bathurst Panthers Club, 2 November 2013.


Election day reflections on religion in the public square

12 Comments
Frank Brennan | 07 September 2013

How clever of you to choose the day of the federal election for me to offer these reflections.  I come amongst you, not as a publisher or journalist but as an advocate in the public square animated by my own religious tradition as a Jesuit and Catholic priest engaged on human rights issues in a robustly pluralistic democratic society.


The case for funding legal services with public money

3 Comments
Andrew Hamilton | 08 November 2013

From a liberal perspective the use of public money to fund free legal services to individuals is inherently undesirable. Even if the contracts are awarded under competitive tendering, the funding of the services is a distortion in the market. Ideally they should be left to the market to provide. And by definition they are less efficient than commercial organisations disciplined by a free and competitive market.


Finding a just oil and gas settlement between Australia and Timor-Leste

1 Comment
Frank Brennan | 25 September 2014

UCD Dublin CrestThere is nothing to be gained for Australia and Timor as neighbours airing dirty laundry in exalted international fora.  It is time for both countries to agree to put the unresolved boundary issue to bed, seeking an agreement or determination by conciliation of the differences between them concerning the Timor Sea.  The situation is similar to neighbours agreeing not to settle the boundary of their back fence.  That is all very fine unless and until there is a problem. 


Is our morality at sea with the refugees?

8 Comments
Frank Brennan | 11 April 2014

'We should abandon talk of taking Australia off the table. We should also abandon talk of taking the sugar off the table. The collateral damage of that is too great. The best we can do ethically and practically is to put the sugar out of reach while leaving it on the table for those who make it here with a visa or in direct flight from persecution.' Frank Brennan contributes to a Palm Sunday panel at St Michael's Uniting Church, Melbourne.