A- A A+

Communities still need the stimulus

Julie Edwards |  10 May 2010

The fall-out from the economic stimulus package, whether it is insulation, school halls or public housing, continues to cause political headaches for the Rudd Government.

As a result, there are widespread calls for the stimulus measures to be quickly wound back as the Australian economy emerges from the global economic crisis.

It would appear that as an exercise in public policy, the objectives of the economic stimulus have been largely achieved, as Australia has emerged unscathed from the worst ravages of the meltdown.

As the global economic crisis enveloped the western world in spring 2008, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd invoked the spectre of the Great Depression and described it as 'the economic equivalent of a rolling national security crisis'.

And while the PM's language may — in hindsight — have been melodramatic, most credible economic commentators endorsed the magnitude of the $42 billion stimulus package.

Now some 18 months on, it would appear that the normal world order is resuming — the banks are again functioning and profitable and China's thirst for Australian resources continues.

Fortunately, middle Australia avoided the soup kitchen queues.

However our most disadvantaged communities are still our most disadvantaged communities; in such communities economic crisis is a permanent situation. Social conditions are characterised by double digit unemployment, high rates of criminal convictions and imprisonment, poor educational and employment attainment and, in some areas, child abuse and neglect.

The team I work with at Jesuit Social Services has continually reminded governments that tackling stubborn place based disadvantage requires a sustained and coordinated mix of investment and government service reform to be continually applied over many, many years. It cannot be fixed with just 18 months of economic stimulus.

The Victorian Government has just released its sixth A Fairer Victoria statement which contains over $1 billion in funding for services to help combat poverty and promote social inclusion.

We have supported A Fairer Victoria since its inception in 2004, in particular the recognition that combating disadvantage requires a persistent and strategic approach that mobilises the resources of Government in partnership with the third sector.

While the Victorian Government can certainly do more in terms of the quantum of investment underpinning A Fairer Victoria and strengthen its focus on reforming government services to respond better to the unique challenges of disadvantaged communities, the broad policy objectives are fundamentally sound.

I believe that the Victorian approach provides a ready template for the Australian Government to adopt to allow for the continuation of economic stimulus measures — but targeted at our most disadvantaged communities.

Research we conducted in 1999 (Unequal in Life), 2004 (Community Adversity and Resilience) and 2007 (Dropping Off The Edge, in partnership with Catholic Social Services Australia) undertaken by Professor Tony Vinson pointed to the convergence of evidence of disadvantage in communities including: limited education, deficient labour market credentials, indifferent health and disabilities, low individual family income, engagement in crime and child maltreatment.

According to Professor Vinson, this presented a 'mundane but enduring story' but also points to the need for a 'persistent effort of seven to eight years' to help shift disadvantage which has been entrenched over decades.

This means sustained investment in projects that create jobs for young people in disadvantaged communities to build community resilience. Intensive and coordinated efforts are needed by government, the private and third sector to drag some of these communities into the economic mainstream.

The fact that children can have their life trajectory largely mapped out from an early age because of their postcode, as Professor Vinson points out, 'offends our national values, especially the idea of a fair go'.

So despite the well documented implementation problems, it would appear the economic stimulus package has achieved its broad policy objectives — protecting middle Australia from recession. Now that the tide of gloom has receded the pressure is on the Government to ditch the stimulus.

However we urge the Rudd Government in this year's budget and in subsequent budgets to continue the economic stimulus — but focused on our most disadvantaged communities, truly creating A Fairer Australia.


Julie EdwardsJulie Edwards is CEO of Jesuit Social Services. 

 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Similar articles

Keeping vigil for slain Indian student

13 Comments
Cara Munro | 06 January 2010

Candlelight vigilThey came to stop the violence. Four, maybe five of them, in hooded jackets and pale, worn jeans. Hovering in the car park. Shadow-like. Haunted. We were gathered outside the place to which he had come, bleeding, begging for help. Wrongly, we assumed they had come to join us.


What we have lost

3 Comments
Andrew Hamilton | 04 December 2010

World CupSo Australia has lost its bid to host the World Cup. In a single night the Holy Grail of the World Cup was transmuted to tin, the Light on the Hill of 2022 was snuffed out, the Crystal Sea that would convey worshipful hordes to Australia turned to seaweed.


The religious beliefs of Australia's prime ministers

12 Comments
John Warhurst | 11 November 2010

Ben Chifley

Nine prime ministers have been observant Christians. Two have been conventional Christians. Ten have been nominal Christians. Five have been articulate atheists or agnostics. One was a nominal atheist or agnostic.


Brian's story

4 Comments
Tony Vinson | 25 October 2010

My mother never really coped while I was growing up. My dad died when I was seven and she had a nervous breakdown. My sister got murdered when I was about 15. She had just turned 18. That's when my life rolled out of control. 


Vote for hope

20 Comments
John Falzon | 20 August 2010Ngunnawal Elder Aunty Janet Phillips says that for Aboriginal Australians there's no 'justice'; 'just us'. How can we turn this election into a building block for a more equal society? The answer involves weighing up the known policies and track-record of both sides to assess their impact on the growth of inequality.